Live data from Hacker News

Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

wikileaks.org

171–180 of 201 posts

Re: Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

#171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

why should your readers accept your unsubstantiated hypothesis The typical line of thinking with conspiracy theories seems to be the less substantiated the theory, the more credence it should be lent, under the logic that the government is suppressing evidence. So basically the less evidence, the more believable. Beautiful, isn't it?

Except for the fact that there are more false statements than true ones...

Ssshh, pay no mind to the man behind the curtain.

Re: Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

#172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I always liked the idea of making income tax filings public. Seems like it would make catching people who are dodging tax and the relevant discussions around it a lot easier.

also, makes it easier to figure out who to kidnap and also who to blackmail.

No easier then driving around the nearest gated multi-million-dollar community. Or a trip through the Trader Joes parking lot.

Re: Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

#173
post #2

Any good overviews of this leak yet?

I just skimmed the whole thing. If you've paid attention at all to news related to IP issues in the last 10 years, none of the content of this agreement would come as a surprise. I don't see any radically different provisions here compared to current laws.

The portions on 'genetic resources' were most interesting I thought, only because everything was so vaguely defined that I worried how countries would interpret it.

Re: Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

#174
post #144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would Congress pass legislation saying that it's not allowed to amend trade agreements? Why don't they just not amend trade agreements?

Congress now != congress in 2 years, remember.

Yes, Congress now is only ~90% of what congress will be in 2 years.

Re: Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

#175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even better, what if the government was closing in a child pornographer with chemical weapons and a nuke, and the leak allowed him to rape more children while nuking a nunnery and poisoning an orphanage?

> Child pornographer with chemical weapons and a nuke Do even approximations to such boogieman figures even exist?

Kim Jong Il?

Re: Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

#176
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You forgot ...thus lowering house prices in a wide area . Now the electorate are on your side!

Wouldn't that only make the buyers happy, and the sellers upset? ;)

You'd expect so. But the buyers are looking for a greater fool to flip the real estate to at a higher price later.

Re: Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

#177
post #158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Kind sir, we appear to have run out of Nazi extermination camps. However, I invite you to book a one-way trip to North Korea. I hear their concentration camps are wonderful this time of the year.

And how did NK end up being that crazy? USA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_War#Bombing_North_Korea "As a result, almost every substantial building in North Korea was destroyed."

How do destroyed buildings lead to such craziness?

Re: Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

#178
post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would it violate any rights to privacy? What rights are you talking about, anyway? The only thing we don't share openly in this manner is personal health problems.

To clarify: It's my right, if I so choose, to keep my salary and any other personal financial information private from the rest of the world (minus of course, my employer and the IRS). So your releasing that information is a violation of my privacy.

Which jurisdiction are you talking about? swombat looks like they are sitting in the UK.

Re: Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

#179

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I really . . . hope . . . that governments will become incapable of keeping anything a secret. Does that include personal information about you, for example your personal medical information that is part of the treatment records of a government-administered medical insurance plan? Some countries (not many) make personal income tax filings public information. Do you live in such a country?

I always liked the idea of making income tax filings public. Seems like it would make catching people who are dodging tax and the relevant discussions around it a lot easier.

While you are at it, might as well make voting rights proportional to taxes paid (perhaps plus a free allowance to allow poor people to have a say at all).

Re: Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

#180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You forgot drugs, drugs are bad.

Nah, not anymore, doesn't scare the sheeple like it use to.

Only if you ignore today's bogeymen:

* Methamphetamine

* "Bath salts" (i.e. MDPV)

* Synthetic cannibinoids

Post reply on HN