If sharing this in your organisation is a career limiting move, may I suggest that your organisation is irretrievably fucked (see what I did there) and only cares about superficial garbage. Such organisations are doomed and tend to be stacked with useless ladder-climbers.
My advice; share the article with relevant people if they need education about doorslams. If people complain, tell them that they're shooting the messenger and should pay attention to what they're actually doing, instead of wasting their shareholders' money enforcing bullshit that serves no purpose except for making useless, self-righteous moral defenders feel better.
The ideal solution is to never hire self righteous moral defenders because they actively wreck the culture of organisations. Objecting to swearing is a clear case of intolerant asshats choosing to be offended. To avoid these losers in your company, swear when conducting the interview, and if they're so utterly thick and self-righteous that they show offense, stop the interview immediately and show them the door.
The person a couple of posts back nailed it when they said this:
"His word choices are not hate speech or discriminatory so the fact that they may offend your sensibilities has precisely zero relevance to anything."
... and finally, I thought the article was great. I'm sharing it at work with the product team. Since our product team is free of idiots, I'm pretty sure this won't be a career limiting move.