Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes she mentioned that her website was getting DDOSed and that she was going to put it behind Cloudflare. I'm not sure its a DDOS though, it could just be the amount of traffic she's getting from HN/Reddit/Twitter/etc. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5400134 EDIT: It seems that her personal website (adriarichards.com) is down too.
How is putting it behind Cloudflare going to help now that the (alleged) DDoSers have the IP address of the actual server?
Sendgrid is down
71–80 of 107 posts
Re: Sendgrid is down
#72Re: Sendgrid is down
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
Woman standing for herself, aka a woman randomly attacking a man who made a joke about dongles? Really? I will definitely feel schadenfreude if her bank account gets hacked. After all, she did rid a person of their income by her actions.
What the fuck is HN becoming...Jesus.
2 posts.
Happens all the time, always has.
Re: Sendgrid is down
#74Re: Sendgrid is down
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is a huge stretch- at least partly because there is no third party verification that Adria's blog is actually victim to a DDOS attack, as far as I know. I'm not accusing her of lying, just that "a huge, huge number of people reading your blog post" can look a lot like a DDOS attack if you're running an unoptimised version of Wordpress, or similar.
It's uncharitable of you to assume she can't tell the difference between a botnet and a spike in traffic. The "third-party verification" is that her site came back online after implementing CloudFlare's DDoS mitigation.
I don't think so. It's incredibly difficult to tell the difference, given that a DDOS is a huge spike in traffic.
Re: Sendgrid is down
#76Even though I'm a SG customer, I can't help but feel a little schadenfreude. edit: when I made this comment I thought this was a random service failure that would last couple of minutes. More than 1 hour later, I don't think it's that funny anymore as I'm being affected as well.
Really? All it says to me is that people in the tech field are so against a woman standing up for herself that they're actually willing to bring down the company she works for. It's disgusting. Will you also feel schadenfreude when they hack her bank account?
Second, she wasn't "standing up" for herself because nobody wronged her. Overhearing a third-party say something about a dongle that you construe in a sexual light isn't being wronged, and the world doesn't require you to "stand up" to it.
Re: Sendgrid is down
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's uncharitable of you to assume she can't tell the difference between a botnet and a spike in traffic. The "third-party verification" is that her site came back online after implementing CloudFlare's DDoS mitigation.
It's uncharitable of you to assume she can't tell the difference between a botnet and a spike in traffic. I don't think so. It's incredibly difficult to tell the difference, given that a DDOS is a huge spike in traffic.
Re: Sendgrid is down
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
Really? All it says to me is that people in the tech field are so against a woman standing up for herself that they're actually willing to bring down the company she works for. It's disgusting. Will you also feel schadenfreude when they hack her bank account?
Woman standing for herself, aka a woman randomly attacking a man who made a joke about dongles? Really? I will definitely feel schadenfreude if her bank account gets hacked. After all, she did rid a person of their income by her actions.
1. The guy who got fired had an overzealous manager who fired with insufficient cause.
2. The guy who got fired had a history that we don't know, but the manager does, and this was the final straw.
Both theories are possible. I personally have known a higher portion of guys fitting #2 than managers who would enable #1. Therefore conditional probability suggests to me that he was fired for more than just this incident. If so then his firing would not be her fault.
(Even in #1 the firing was not her fault - it was the manager's.)
Re: Sendgrid is down
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
What do you mean by "to warm up an IP"?
If an IP address does not have a history of sending [large amounts of] email it is considered "cold". If that IP address then suddenly begins sending huge numbers of emails, many providers will assume the worst (that the email is being used for SPAM) and either block the IP or mark messages coming from it as SPAM. "Warming up" the IP means sending a smaller number of emails (per time period) and slowly increasing the…
I'm not saying this to advertise but to offer a suggestion: call someone and ask for help. This isn't an unusual need at all and any reputable provider will be quick to help.
Short version: you don't have to "warm up an IP" if you do a little advance homework.
Re: Sendgrid is down
#80First we replaced SMTP that was distributed and designed to be resilient to outages (i.e. not lose messages) with proprietary HTTP APIs and now we complain that they don't notify us via email when they are down. Nice. I am guilty of using SES myself, but it's sad to see email becoming increasingly centralized.
While I'm sure a lot of SendGrid's customers don't want (or don't know how) to configure a mail server, there are other customers who know that delivering email isn't as simple as installing Postfix. The rise of centralized email services is the inevitable byproduct.