Live data from Hacker News

Posterous cofounders create a replacement: Posthaven

posthaven.com

71–80 of 144 posts

Re: Posterous cofounders create a replacement: Posthaven

#71
post #60
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

the founders of Posterous who sold out and then shuttered their service Seriously? Just gonna throw 'em under the bus like that? Friends like these.. Its time to stop trotting out this meme that the alternative to an "aquihire" was a sustainable business. Sometimes you've got to fish or cut bait. Ad hominem aside, trust should never be required for a good agreement. PostHaven has made a great start by killing any acq…

There's nothing wrong with selling out. I assume Posterous was founded to make a profit at some point and selling out allowed them to do that. I'm actually 100% okay with that. I was merely calling out that "never selling out" is a strange proposal coming from someone with a track record for selling out...on the day that this former sold out service announces it is shutting down forever. It might just be bad timing t…

According to Garry [1], they had no idea that Twitter would make the announcement today, so the bad timing seems coincidental.

[1] https://twitter.com/garrytan/status/302558780447682560

Re: Posterous cofounders create a replacement: Posthaven

#72

Whoever made this should submit an application to be in the next YC batch. I have a strong feeling they would get in. :)

The cofounders of Posterous. They don't need YC. They were in YC.

And garry is actually a partner at YC now anyway.

Re: Posterous cofounders create a replacement: Posthaven

#73
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

the founders of Posterous who sold out and then shuttered their service Seriously? Just gonna throw 'em under the bus like that? Friends like these.. Its time to stop trotting out this meme that the alternative to an "aquihire" was a sustainable business. Sometimes you've got to fish or cut bait. Ad hominem aside, trust should never be required for a good agreement. PostHaven has made a great start by killing any acq…

> PostHaven has made a great start by killing any acquisition value from Day 1 by making their defining feature a promise never to sell. Just like OkCupid's intensive, well-researched, data-driven post on why online dating needs to be free scared off Match.com from acquiring them?

Okcupid still is free.

Re: Posterous cofounders create a replacement: Posthaven

#74

Whoever made this should submit an application to be in the next YC batch. I have a strong feeling they would get in. :)

The cofounders of Posterous. They don't need YC. They were in YC.

One of them, Garry, is a YC partner [1]

[1] http://ycombinator.posterous.com/welcome-garry-and-aaron

[The irony of linking to a Posterous post is not lost on me - I wonder when that link will be dead]

Re: Posterous cofounders create a replacement: Posthaven

#75
post #5
post #2

Great - until that one gets acquired or acqui-hired by Facebook|MS|Google... I wish there were some open source resource sharing protocol a bit more high-level than HTTP.

Like Brad said -- this one is not to be sold. We'll charge money and keep the lights on no matter what. We want to provide this service like a basic utility like water and power, because that's what having a voice on the Internet should be.

Unfortunately no business regardless of the desire can guarantee it will run forever. It's not a matter of will alone. Any agreement to never sell your shares would imply that a entity structure without shares would better fit your stated motives.

Re: Posterous cofounders create a replacement: Posthaven

#77
post #58
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When I started working on Posterous in 2008, I intended to work on it forever. It didn't work out that way, and I left in January of 2011. It was a venture-funded company by then and we were committed to super-growth, not sustainability. We never started charging for the product. Posthaven is the result of my experience with that. I know the world needs a simple, clean, well-lit, easy place to post. One that doesn't…

On the one hand, you have street cred for building an awesome product which inspires confidence that your next product will be awesome too. I don't doubt it will be awesome. But on the other hand, you did accept VC funding for Posterous (I'm assuming nobody was holding a gun to your head and forced you to do it), and for whatever reason you then left and moved onto other projects. Now you are saying you will never se…

[deleted]

Re: Posterous cofounders create a replacement: Posthaven

#79
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When I started working on Posterous in 2008, I intended to work on it forever. It didn't work out that way, and I left in January of 2011. It was a venture-funded company by then and we were committed to super-growth, not sustainability. We never started charging for the product. Posthaven is the result of my experience with that. I know the world needs a simple, clean, well-lit, easy place to post. One that doesn't…

since you're posting here, you have a grocer's apostrophe on the home page... it's "URLs", not "URL's". second, can we auto-migrate somehow from a posterous backup - my wife runs a blog on posterous and is really worried that she needs to migrate. if i could tell her that she just now needs to pay $5/month and not rely on me to hack something together w/octopress and github she will be so excited.

Depends on your style guide. Sometimes the apostrophe is preferred for abbreviations because it separates the s. ie, it's not something I'd correct somebody for unless we had specifically and previously agreed to a particular style guide.

Re: Posterous cofounders create a replacement: Posthaven

#80
post #77
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On the one hand, you have street cred for building an awesome product which inspires confidence that your next product will be awesome too. I don't doubt it will be awesome. But on the other hand, you did accept VC funding for Posterous (I'm assuming nobody was holding a gun to your head and forced you to do it), and for whatever reason you then left and moved onto other projects. Now you are saying you will never se…

[deleted]

No, VC funding was not the mistake. The mistake was mine as a founder for not charging for Posterous. This is why we will charge money this time.
Post reply on HN