Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

GPT-6 Astra

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

921–930 of 1001 posts

Re: GPT-6 Astra

#921

Post by golly_ned »

renegade-otter wrote: post #865
tappio wrote: post #857

I feel that for some time now, the biggest constraint when working with models is not their intelligence, but their speed. It does not matter how smart the model is, it will make mistakes, because the instructions are ambiguous and new facts are found during implementation. The biggest problem I've had working with software developers has always been the lag between seeing the results and steering towards the right d…

AI models do not live and learn - it's worse. They actually get DUMMER if you don't start with a clean slate. This is important. One has to curate the context carefully.

Dumber.

Re: GPT-6 Astra

#922

Post by laybak »

bloggie wrote: post #858
throwaway13337 wrote: post #429

That hero video is interesting. A projector and speech. Maybe I'm in the minority here, but I find speech to text / text to speech (but not live audio mode) is quite comfortable and effective for coding now. The speech to text part can be frustrating if your local tts model does not have word match context for coding. Codex desktop does this remotely well but is slow. I've been experimenting with local software for m…

>this could bring us closer to the dream of more natural, social computing What I saw was multiple people living alone in a small box in a warehouse (probably filled with other boxes) with all of their natural, social interactions directed at a wall. I wonder if this is foreshadowing for the future of work, at least it is what work will look like as envisioned by OpenAI.

this observation is insightful and worth calling out. this paints the picture of a future I'm not excited about

Re: GPT-6 Astra

#923

Post by aennassiri »

I firmly believed OpenAI would take back the lead. It's healthy to have competition with Anthropic and, hopefully, other LLM providers. I'm excited to test their model. Their attitude towards developers/builders has been nice and appreciated for the last couple of months.

Re: GPT-6 Astra

#924

Post by causal »

tintor wrote: post #640

- OpenAI claims Astra beats all benchmarks (compared to Fable and Opus, except "Humanity's Last Exam (w/ tools)"): https://openai.com/index/gpt-6-astra/ - Artificial Analysis scores Astra (max effort) as 61 points on intelligence, behind Opus 5. https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gpt-6-astra Who is wrong here? Some benchmark results in Astra page for Fable and Opus are blank (-). What is Artificial Analysis intelli…

Used curiously fewer tokens, however.

Re: GPT-6 Astra

#925

Post by TomGarden »

geonic wrote: post #718

These demos got me exited. Sitting in front of my computer telling ChatGPT what to do while watching the results in realtime. Hope this ends up working in reality.

not a chance its gonna be realtime lol. It's fun marketing though, I'll allow it

Re: GPT-6 Astra

#926

Post by zaphirplane »

enraged_camel wrote: post #691
jumploops wrote: post #476

I think the thing I'm most excited about is the increase in _user prompting_. If I give a poorly constrained/ambiguous prompt, I don't want the model one-shotting assumptions left and right. The demos of Fable/GPT-6 are impressive, but "real AGI" should act more like a collaborator than either a peon or overachiever. It's a tough balance to get right, and although this has been possible to achieve with additional pro…

>>> The demos of Fable/GPT-6 are impressive, but "real AGI" should act more like a collaborator than either a peon or overachiever. I don't really agree. The thing that makes Fable feel like an actual collaborator is its ability to sus out your real intent when you give ambiguous instructions. It's really good at it. I watched some reviews today and came way with the impression that Astra is not better than Sol in th…

Why would I ask a LLM a rhetorical question

Re: GPT-6 Astra

#927

Post by mannanj »

chriskanan wrote: post #869
astrobiased wrote: post #366

I can’t help but notice how much this echoes Francois Chollet’s On the Measure of Intelligence: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547 Most of frontier-model progress still looks like skill acquisition optimization: broader benchmark coverage and performance, more domains absorbed into the training distribution, and increasingly strong performance within that surface area. It seems more about coverage-driven competence. So…

You are conflating multiple things. 1) First, you are talking about positive forward transfer in continual learning. I've been giving talks for the past 6-7 years about how that community (I was one of the founders) went astray and wasn't focusing enough on that topic, but continual learning of the kind you are thinking isn't in any of these systems right now. I think some people left the Grok team to make a start-up…

What have you defined as creativity and intelligence?

Re: GPT-6 Astra

#928

Post by Davidzheng »

zarzavat wrote: post #738
tintor wrote: post #640

- OpenAI claims Astra beats all benchmarks (compared to Fable and Opus, except "Humanity's Last Exam (w/ tools)"): https://openai.com/index/gpt-6-astra/ - Artificial Analysis scores Astra (max effort) as 61 points on intelligence, behind Opus 5. https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gpt-6-astra Who is wrong here? Some benchmark results in Astra page for Fable and Opus are blank (-). What is Artificial Analysis intelli…

> Humanity's Last Exam (w/ tools) This is one of the only benchmarks that actually matters for testing the frontier however. Other benchmarks can be gamed by simply being more persistent, but HLE is a diverse set of open-ended research-level questions. It tests domain knowledge and problem solving skills. Burning more reasoning tokens may help somewhat but not as much as e.g. coding benchmarks.

Do we even know what the true ceiling of hle is? I'm pretty sure some of their public sample questions are wrong (ambiguous/nonsensical with most logical interpretation trivial)

Re: GPT-6 Astra

#929

Post by mannanj »

aennassiri wrote: post #923

I firmly believed OpenAI would take back the lead. It's healthy to have competition with Anthropic and, hopefully, other LLM providers. I'm excited to test their model. Their attitude towards developers/builders has been nice and appreciated for the last couple of months.

I find that when someone comes from an attitude of abuse and hostility towards it users, then later without taking responsibility and owning its original actions says “we changed were being nice now” that it isn’t really a change but a farce to continue to trick you. I used to be more gullible and naive and fall for these tricks, but not anymore.

You change when you take ownership of your past mistakes and share with those you harmed how you have done that. With some reparation and restoration of past harms. I haven’t seen openAI do that.

Re: GPT-6 Astra

#930

Post by mark_l_watson »

Please, I have a question: in September 2026, what is the price differential between buying GPT inference tokens vs. a $20/month subscription?

I have moved to just using Google Gemini occasionally paying for tokens, no subscription, and it is OK, given my low level of use.

I would like to add gpt-6 astra to my toolbox, but I probably would use it infrequently.

Post reply on HN