No projections/information/analysis. The statement from someone with a vested interest in this demand lasting an extended period of time (including the statement that demand will continue past 2030).
In theory, shouldn't he say exactly the opposite thing if this was the goal? If demand is projected continue for a long time, this may encourage more competitors to enter this space, so supply will increase. On the other hand if everyone thought that the demand will end soon, nobody would invest in more capacity and shortage would last longer. I think this is just for short term shareholder profit.
Competitors are going to come online anyway because of the threat of chip embargoes against China that mean they are investing in production regardless of what the outside world is doing.