Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

U.S. sanctions against the A/I Collective

inventati.org

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

611–620 of 824 posts

Re: U.S. sanctions against the A/I Collective

#611

Post by inigyou »

jasonlotito wrote: post #21
ecshafer wrote: post #16

[flagged]

> So I don't think this is as innocent as they seem. Well, they are innocent until proven guilty. > They are making and providing tools that enable communication specifically for Far Left groups, some of which are terrorist groups. By all means, present something that shows they are knowingly supporting terrorist groups so we might judge for ourselves. I mean, we have organizations that supported the January 6th terr…

> they are innocent until proven guilty

In modern US law this is incorrect, it is now guilty until proven innocent, and then still guilty after that.

Re: U.S. sanctions against the A/I Collective

#612

Post by inigyou »

tptacek wrote: post #64
jasonlotito wrote: post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My understanding is that this is only coming from the US government. Do we have any reliable information to back this up? Because if it's just the US government, I can safely assume it's all lies.

I have no idea, but --- non-normatively --- there is some signal to be gleaned from this particular provider being targeted and not other, better-known and more systemically important ones.

The signal is only that they are small enough the collateral damage is not too great for the government to bear.

Re: U.S. sanctions against the A/I Collective

#613

Post by inigyou »

dismalaf wrote: post #369
OKRainbowKid wrote: post #126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So anti-fascism ist deemed an extreme movement by the US government? What does that say about them?

A tactic of certain "anti-fascist" groups is to simply call anyone they don't like fascist and attack them. Just like actual fascists used to excuse violence as "anti-communist". Claiming to be anti-fascist doesn't actually make them anti-fascist nor excuse them from breaking laws.

A tactic of certain fascist groups is to simply claim their opponents simply call anyone they don't like fascist and attack them. How can we objectively decide who's right?

Re: U.S. sanctions against the A/I Collective

#614

Post by inigyou »

talon8635 wrote: post #445
cdrnsf wrote: post #301

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Well the nazis called themselves socialist. I’m not saying this is that, but names are often chosen to mislead people I don’t think antifa is an kind of organized anything But I can say with certainty that people claiming that title smashes the shit out of property and people for a few years post Floyd where I’ve been in various areas of the west coast Some are probably genuine do-gooders who oppose fascism. Others a…

It's super easy for me to claim the title of something I don't like, and then go smash a bunch of property. For example I could call myself a Republican, then smash a bunch of property. Would you then believe republicans are violent property smashers?

Re: U.S. sanctions against the A/I Collective

#615

Post by inigyou »

tartoran wrote: post #362
includenotfound wrote: post #337

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Antifa is a terrorist organization. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/09/desi... It follows that those hosting them are chased

Yeah, yeah, soon any opposition to Trump or Israel is deemed terrorist...

It's not soon, it's literally right now.

Re: U.S. sanctions against the A/I Collective

#616

Post by jrflowers »

CMay wrote: post #527
mindslight wrote: post #421

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> As for the constitution, they are surrounded by lawyers and if they overstep something, they back off. They are applying unitary executive theory as a solution to a slow congress to address the many critical issues facing the US in our time, one of which is demonstrating to China that we can act, which is one more element of deterrence to prevent them from starting World War 3. The solution to save the country is t…

> The solution to save the country is to write off the Constitution in favor of "unitary executive theory" aka autocracy? Unitary Executive Theory is not autocracy. You seem to have capacity to reason and maybe don't understand how the US works, so I'll explain. In the US, we have many states. All of the states can check the federal government, because it is the states that created the federal government to start wit…

Can you name some of the communist billionaires

Re: U.S. sanctions against the A/I Collective

#617

Post by inigyou »

jscd wrote: post #564
p-e-w wrote: post #448

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Then they are an activist group, not an “infrastructure provider” as claimed elsewhere in this thread, and holding them responsible for what their members do with the accounts they give them seems entirely fair.

being selective about who you provide free services to makes you an activist group?

Yes, see, if you sell guns, but you only sell guns to people who promise to use them for defense, but don't sell them to people who promise to murder, that makes you an activist gun seller and personally responsible for whatever happens with those guns.

Re: U.S. sanctions against the A/I Collective

#618

Post by throwawayqqq11 »

kova12 wrote: post #465
OKRainbowKid wrote: post #126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So anti-fascism ist deemed an extreme movement by the US government? What does that say about them?

[flagged]

Meanwhile, you find weapon stashes and insurgency plans on what political side?

Re: U.S. sanctions against the A/I Collective

#619

Post by inigyou »

ls612 wrote: post #504
Fraterkes wrote: post #437

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Here's my "nuanced" take: If a pro-zionist group were officialy designated as terrorists for spraying paint into a jet-engine I would find that ridiculous too.

Sabotage of military aircraft is political violence.

It's direct action. Violence is direct action against people's bodies, not property directly involved in genocide.

Re: U.S. sanctions against the A/I Collective

#620

Post by cogman10 »

Amezarak wrote: post #493
cogman10 wrote: post #471

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd look at the Prairieland Detention Center Case to understand how broadly and aggressively this government is using "terrorism" to go after political opponents. Daniel Rolando Sanchez-Estrada got 30 years in prison for moving a box of magazines related to the protest. He wasn't even at the actual protest. Several people got decades in jail because the FBI successfully convinced a jury that setting off fireworks nea…

> Several people got decades in jail because the FBI successfully convinced a jury that setting off fireworks near a detention center on the 4th of july was actually detonating bombs. And that because one idiot brought a gun and shot it, they are all guilty. The USG has a somewhat different description of events, and appears to have had video that they showed a jury. > The defendants dressed in “black bloc”—dark clot…

> and he actually shot a police officer during their "protest."

He did not, he shot at an officer and missed. He was also the only one of the protestors that shot.

Post reply on HN