Live data from Hacker News

Civilians under siege by Mexican cartel fight back with AK-47s, grenades

pbs.org

101–109 of 109 posts

Re: Civilians under siege by Mexican cartel fight back with AK-47s, grenades

#101
post #2

So you're forced to join a gang and fight their rival gangs, or you form your own gang equipped with rifles and grenades ready to commit violence, so that you can fight against joining that gang, or any other gang. Either way you're in a violent gang. I guess I'd rather have the state maintain a monopoly on violence.

> I guess I'd rather have the state maintain a monopoly on violence.

Yes, until they go completely outlaw rogue like ice has done in the USA.

Re: Civilians under siege by Mexican cartel fight back with AK-47s, grenades

#102
post #65
post #2

So you're forced to join a gang and fight their rival gangs, or you form your own gang equipped with rifles and grenades ready to commit violence, so that you can fight against joining that gang, or any other gang. Either way you're in a violent gang. I guess I'd rather have the state maintain a monopoly on violence.

I agree, not all violence is the same. But further, perhaps our sense of morality atrophies when we concede the idea of just violence (just as in "justice") only to the state. I presume those fighting the cartels might have more of a developed sense of civic pride and duty than anyone in a more stable place. Perhaps I'm wrong though

[deleted]

Re: Civilians under siege by Mexican cartel fight back with AK-47s, grenades

#103
post #16

Mexico has been like that for decades, I believe it's top 1 priority for most Mexicans yet it's still not fixed. What gives ? At some point when your government is so corrupt, you got to take weapon and organize yourself. It's sad.

A characteristic of most of Latin America is that the Police and the Army were created to protect power, not the people, and there hasn't really been an effort to change the mentality.

Why do you think the brits arrest peaceful protesters? It's like you can't even say free Palestine without being considered a terrorist

Re: Civilians under siege by Mexican cartel fight back with AK-47s, grenades

#104
post #2

So you're forced to join a gang and fight their rival gangs, or you form your own gang equipped with rifles and grenades ready to commit violence, so that you can fight against joining that gang, or any other gang. Either way you're in a violent gang. I guess I'd rather have the state maintain a monopoly on violence.

The Founding Fathers would have rejected that premise. They designed the American system in deliberate opposition to the idea of an unchallengeable state monopoly on legitimate force.

Re: Civilians under siege by Mexican cartel fight back with AK-47s, grenades

#105
post #10

the real war the US should be fighting

There's no need to fight. The proper solution is to end the war on drugs, allowing people to do what they will with their own bodies. Once people can legally buy their drugs, the cartels will starve. Use the money saved from reducing our prison population by 75% to pay for widely-accessible treatment for addiction as well as mental health problems. Build more affordable housing so homelessness is less of an issue. As…

where exactly are you going to grow cocaine? on the cartel's land?

Re: Civilians under siege by Mexican cartel fight back with AK-47s, grenades

#106
post #101
post #2

So you're forced to join a gang and fight their rival gangs, or you form your own gang equipped with rifles and grenades ready to commit violence, so that you can fight against joining that gang, or any other gang. Either way you're in a violent gang. I guess I'd rather have the state maintain a monopoly on violence.

> I guess I'd rather have the state maintain a monopoly on violence. Yes, until they go completely outlaw rogue like ice has done in the USA.

And by go rogue you mean do exactly as ordered

Re: Civilians under siege by Mexican cartel fight back with AK-47s, grenades

#107
post #101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I guess I'd rather have the state maintain a monopoly on violence. Yes, until they go completely outlaw rogue like ice has done in the USA.

And by go rogue you mean do exactly as ordered

If you want to put it that way, yes.

The US government is split into three branches with separation of powers. The executive branch does not have the authority to give orders which bypass laws and the constitution. Any agency that follows such orders has gone rogue, as following illegal orders is the definition of that.

Re: Civilians under siege by Mexican cartel fight back with AK-47s, grenades

#108
post #2

So you're forced to join a gang and fight their rival gangs, or you form your own gang equipped with rifles and grenades ready to commit violence, so that you can fight against joining that gang, or any other gang. Either way you're in a violent gang. I guess I'd rather have the state maintain a monopoly on violence.

This is a bad take. When the stste is either unable or unwilling to offer security, what is the alternative? The 'vigilantes' are doing the honorable thing, protecting their communities from criminals and oppressors. I wish them all good luck as it seem like they need it.

The danger always is that these militias can themselves become corrupt and oppress their own people.

Re: Civilians under siege by Mexican cartel fight back with AK-47s, grenades

#109
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What choice do they have? This is not your usual vigilante group. This is a reaction to an overwhelming force of criminal gangs killing citizens and the government being powerless to stop them.

> This is a reaction to an overwhelming force of criminal gangs killing citizens and the government being powerless to stop them. Is the Mexican government, with their tens of billions in military spending, actually "powerless" to stop these gangs? I very much doubt it.

There have been many examples of non-corrupt officials being elected and then killed.

The corruption isn't always "I want to get rich" type, sometimes it's "I don't want to be murdered in a horrific way" type.

Post reply on HN