[flagged]
Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta warn against overregulating open-weight models
81–90 of 337 posts
Re: Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta warn against overregulating open-weight models
#82Re: Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta warn against overregulating open-weight models
#83I thought it would've made a lot of sense for Apple to be on this list as well.
Re: Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta warn against overregulating open-weight models
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
well let's be clear, there's nothing open about an open-weight model. To me, "open these models up. " must mean provide all the data and supporting documentation required to reproduce the model. That would be "open". Postgres is open because you can download all the data and supporting documentation and reproduce the binary yourself. However, being able to only download a postgres binary would make it no longer open.…
Here here! Open weights is the term because it's close to open source but everyone thinks everyone else is an idiot and saying the model is downloadable but you can't recreate it is too difficult for our feeble minds to understand. There are actually open source models out there though, with datasets and training code.
Like, that's just a logical thing to call it. I don't believe anyone is making a judgement on the intelligence of the reader to call it "open weight" when it refers to weights that are openly available.
"Open source" would be a more appropriate term to describe a model which also includes the training source.
Re: Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta warn against overregulating open-weight models
#85I thought it would've made a lot of sense for Apple to be on this list as well.
Re: Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta warn against overregulating open-weight models
#86I wonder why Apple stayed absent from signing this?
Re: Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta warn against overregulating open-weight models
#87Just saw on Microsoft https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility/top...
Re: Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta warn against overregulating open-weight models
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
Regardless of the motivations behind the paper, the fact is that they are right. It's a topsy-turvy world where America closes up and China opens, and I hope it gets corrected soon. And besides, it seems to me like the ethical choice. Given how these models are, in some very real sense, mechanical plagiators, built on the generosity of creators past and present, some of them now in danger of being replaced by the mac…
well let's be clear, there's nothing open about an open-weight model. To me, "open these models up. " must mean provide all the data and supporting documentation required to reproduce the model. That would be "open". Postgres is open because you can download all the data and supporting documentation and reproduce the binary yourself. However, being able to only download a postgres binary would make it no longer open.…
Having a standardized training set is valuable, though.
Re: Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta warn against overregulating open-weight models
#89Re: Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta warn against overregulating open-weight models
#90I wonder why Apple stayed absent from signing this?