Live data from Hacker News

Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta warn against overregulating open-weight models

cnbc.com

81–90 of 337 posts

Re: Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta warn against overregulating open-weight models

#84
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

well let's be clear, there's nothing open about an open-weight model. To me, "open these models up. " must mean provide all the data and supporting documentation required to reproduce the model. That would be "open". Postgres is open because you can download all the data and supporting documentation and reproduce the binary yourself. However, being able to only download a postgres binary would make it no longer open.…

Here here! Open weights is the term because it's close to open source but everyone thinks everyone else is an idiot and saying the model is downloadable but you can't recreate it is too difficult for our feeble minds to understand. There are actually open source models out there though, with datasets and training code.

I think it has more to do with the fact that there has to be some term to describe the concept of "model which has weights that are openly accessible"

Like, that's just a logical thing to call it. I don't believe anyone is making a judgement on the intelligence of the reader to call it "open weight" when it refers to weights that are openly available.

"Open source" would be a more appropriate term to describe a model which also includes the training source.

Re: Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta warn against overregulating open-weight models

#88
post #66
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Regardless of the motivations behind the paper, the fact is that they are right. It's a topsy-turvy world where America closes up and China opens, and I hope it gets corrected soon. And besides, it seems to me like the ethical choice. Given how these models are, in some very real sense, mechanical plagiators, built on the generosity of creators past and present, some of them now in danger of being replaced by the mac…

well let's be clear, there's nothing open about an open-weight model. To me, "open these models up. " must mean provide all the data and supporting documentation required to reproduce the model. That would be "open". Postgres is open because you can download all the data and supporting documentation and reproduce the binary yourself. However, being able to only download a postgres binary would make it no longer open.…

The problem with that analogy is that compiling Postgres takes a few minutes. Training a model takes hundreds of thousands of dollars (at least) and specialized hardware.

Having a standardized training set is valuable, though.

Re: Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta warn against overregulating open-weight models

#89
I don't feel it's meaningful to berate the point anymore about the hypocrisy of the American labs. Now as the sentiment and effort from them to push for regulation increases so does my perception of how pathetic they are behaving. I'm not sure how else to say it other than that it's honestly just embarrassing to watch China and others run circles around us in the USA.
Post reply on HN