No single signin. Privacy policy allows training. No try it first without credit card. It's a good idea, but this looks premature.
Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models
31–40 of 254 posts
Re: Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models
#32I go to the website…and it’s a sign up. I expected a repo. Otherwise how do I use it? As a SaaS? Yeah right.
Oh well I guess at least the benchmarks are good…I find the benchmarks and many are either not present or are not what the title claims.
My main question is how this has so many updoots from HN, probably the passerby not looking closer for sure.
I mean no offense and I really do wish you best on this, but it seems like what we used to call back in the day, vaporware.
Re: Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models
#33But we get ~$2500/mo worth of Fable credits for $200/mo on Anthropic pan? I'm still confused why people (who don't have to use API billing) are chasing open weight models based on cost.
Re: Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models
#34> Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models But we get ~$2500/mo worth of Fable credits for $200/mo on Anthropic pan? I'm still confused why people (who don't have to use API billing) are chasing open weight models based on cost.
Re: Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models
#35> Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models But we get ~$2500/mo worth of Fable credits for $200/mo on Anthropic pan? I'm still confused why people (who don't have to use API billing) are chasing open weight models based on cost.
Re: Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models
#36Is this yet another Sakana Fugu / OpenRouter Fusion?
Re: Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models
#37> Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models But we get ~$2500/mo worth of Fable credits for $200/mo on Anthropic pan? I'm still confused why people (who don't have to use API billing) are chasing open weight models based on cost.
Because that is a short term solution, it won’t be offered forever. Large organisations have to purchase credits at $/tokens. Eventually everyone else will too.
The $200 odd plans are already out of reach of many, many people.
The attrition of customers if they were to get rid of these subscriptions plans would be untenable.
Re: Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models
#38> Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models But we get ~$2500/mo worth of Fable credits for $200/mo on Anthropic pan? I'm still confused why people (who don't have to use API billing) are chasing open weight models based on cost.
Re: Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models
#39Re: Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models
#40> Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models But we get ~$2500/mo worth of Fable credits for $200/mo on Anthropic pan? I'm still confused why people (who don't have to use API billing) are chasing open weight models based on cost.