Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models

news.ycombinator.com

31–40 of 254 posts

Re: Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models

#32
I’m very confused on what this is, my initial thought was “oh nice, open source router.”

I go to the website…and it’s a sign up. I expected a repo. Otherwise how do I use it? As a SaaS? Yeah right.

Oh well I guess at least the benchmarks are good…I find the benchmarks and many are either not present or are not what the title claims.

My main question is how this has so many updoots from HN, probably the passerby not looking closer for sure.

I mean no offense and I really do wish you best on this, but it seems like what we used to call back in the day, vaporware.

Re: Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models

#33
> Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models

But we get ~$2500/mo worth of Fable credits for $200/mo on Anthropic pan? I'm still confused why people (who don't have to use API billing) are chasing open weight models based on cost.

Re: Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models

#34

> Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models But we get ~$2500/mo worth of Fable credits for $200/mo on Anthropic pan? I'm still confused why people (who don't have to use API billing) are chasing open weight models based on cost.

Because that is a short term solution, it won’t be offered forever. Large organisations have to purchase credits at $/tokens. Eventually everyone else will too.

Re: Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models

#35

> Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models But we get ~$2500/mo worth of Fable credits for $200/mo on Anthropic pan? I'm still confused why people (who don't have to use API billing) are chasing open weight models based on cost.

doesnt exist for enterprise plans

Re: Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models

#37

> Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models But we get ~$2500/mo worth of Fable credits for $200/mo on Anthropic pan? I'm still confused why people (who don't have to use API billing) are chasing open weight models based on cost.

Because that is a short term solution, it won’t be offered forever. Large organisations have to purchase credits at $/tokens. Eventually everyone else will too.

This is what OpenAI and Anthropic are trying to make everyone believe. Most accountants will flinch at this (they already are).

The $200 odd plans are already out of reach of many, many people.

The attrition of customers if they were to get rid of these subscriptions plans would be untenable.

Re: Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models

#38

> Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models But we get ~$2500/mo worth of Fable credits for $200/mo on Anthropic pan? I'm still confused why people (who don't have to use API billing) are chasing open weight models based on cost.

You may want to consider the incomes of developers outside the US, students, unemployed. $200/month is a lot to a lot of people.

Re: Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models

#40

> Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models But we get ~$2500/mo worth of Fable credits for $200/mo on Anthropic pan? I'm still confused why people (who don't have to use API billing) are chasing open weight models based on cost.

[flagged]
Post reply on HN