Live data from Hacker News

Codeberg Bans Cryptocurrency Projects

codeberg.org

451–460 of 720 posts

Re: Codeberg Bans Cryptocurrency Projects

#451
post #58

Let this be a reminder to never trust any service be it one ran by a billion dollar company, to one ran by volunteers. You will be eventually screwed over. Make backup plans, and self-host whatever you can so nothing can be taken from you. For Git forges, I personally recommend Gitea[1], or Forgejo[2] (a Gitea fork by Codeberg) [1]: https://about.gitea.com/ [2]: https://forgejo.org/

It’s probably not too important to choose a service that you think you can trust fully, because that trust might be broken at some point. But having an identifier that can be swapped to different backends, so people can find you again when the host inevitability changes, is a stronger strategy. I think the importance of owning domain names will increase, and using those as the canonical identifier of a project will g…

Last week the USA censored the domain name of a Dutch porn site.

Re: Codeberg Bans Cryptocurrency Projects

#452
post #367

I don't think you want to store your source code in a place where they ban projects based on politics [1]: > Allowing these projects is not a neutral stance; the effects to the environment are severe. The "DarkFi" (seemingly some crypto designed for criminals, citing an FBI director) project for example uses a "PoW blockchain" (per their readme). PoW (Proof-Of-Work) projects waste an astonishing amount of computation…

Companies chasing profitmaxxing (to use a fashionable pattern) are just as political, do you complain about those too? Anyway, the answer is the same here: If you don't like it, just don't use them.

Re: Codeberg Bans Cryptocurrency Projects

#453
post #376
post #337

Earlier quoted context omitted.

VPNs are generic networking/security tools that can also be used for things like circumventing geoblocking. Cryptocurrency doesn’t have a lot of use cases outside of money laundering, avoiding sanctions and stealing money through rug pulls.

That doesn’t answer the question. What is the underlying ideology/value system? Lots of people would disagree with your second claim, so if that’s what they believe then this itself implies all kinds of nonstandard values.

I believe it's agreement of a majority of voters.

Re: Codeberg Bans Cryptocurrency Projects

#454
post #429

If this, or the vibe-coding ban upsets you, you're not the target demographic of Codeberg. It's not a big tent project looking to host all the code in the word, like Github is. It's for principled, quality, open source, community-first software. Look at the explore page to see what that means: https://codeberg.org/explore/repos?q=&only_show_relevant=tru... The entire point of Forgejo, the git forge that Codeberg runs…

The problem is that if you are the target demographic now, you’ll never know if you’re still next year or if you’ll be deplatformed and as such it makes for not a very reliable code host.

This happens to literally everything.

Re: Codeberg Bans Cryptocurrency Projects

#455
post #11

They are not the first code hosting service to do so. sourcehut banned cryptocurrency in 2022: https://sourcehut.org/blog/2022-10-31-tos-update-cryptocurre... https://man.sr.ht/terms.md#permissible-use Mostly positive HN discussion when this happened: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33403780

The difference is sourcehut has like 50 users

So what?

Re: Codeberg Bans Cryptocurrency Projects

#456
post #377

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's HN. They like to think they are better than reddit, but in the end this site is a huge echo box, and any outlier causes these reactions, particularly when it's something or someone taking a moral/ethical stance

It feels like a sizeable chunk of this website's user base gets triggered when anyone takes any stance at all.

Other than the neoliberalism stance, "money above all else". This is a marketing site for a VC firm, after all.

Re: Codeberg Bans Cryptocurrency Projects

#457
post #308

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

> Germans democratically elected Hitler This is such a tired trope and myth from people who haven't studied history Also, you're being comically absurd. You're literally comparing codeberg to Nazi Germany? lol

The mindset of today's Germans hasn't changed much over the last century, only the symbolism is banned. As can be seen by the most recent election results.

I don't see what it has to do with Codeberg though.

Re: Codeberg Bans Cryptocurrency Projects

#458

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Were you paying for the service?

Downvoters: if someone indignantly announces they are leaving a service in a manner that suggests its a loss for the service, finding out if they are a paying customer - and in this case, one that can vote on the subject at hand - adds to the discussion.

Also you only have a vote if you pay.

Re: Codeberg Bans Cryptocurrency Projects

#459

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, I don't agree that they have NO idea of what slop is. Basically everyone has some idea, see how often many different people here on HN comment "this is pure slop". Also your claim "they DON'T WANT to have to define" is unproofable. Neither you nor me have any insight into what "they" want or don't want. I think, for these two though errors your train-of-thought is already invalid. Further, I'd even argue that p…

> I don't agree that they have NO idea of what slop is. There's no way for anyone reading their rules to know if their projects are slop. It's full of "mostly" and "significantly". That's virtually guaranteed to boil down to "we don't like it". So "they didn't know how to define it" is about the most charitable interpretation I can muster. Alternative interpretations, such as "the vagueness is a feature since it enab…

If I showed you an image with black sections and red sections, would you be able to decide whether it was mostly black or mostly red?

Re: Codeberg Bans Cryptocurrency Projects

#460
post #230

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> So while the following use cases are discouraged (similar to private repositories), they are likely to be tolerated in practice: > Side projects and experiments with little resource usage > Specific tools and custom scripts that would be unlikely to find a community anyway, even if they were not LLM-generated I really don't want to join a commons where something I make might be "tolerated in practice" based on a gi…

"Side projects with little resource usage" Wow so they banned literally everything?

It's an opinionated charity host for free software. Are you actually making free software or just dumping your junk that is technically free but no one uses? If the latter, they're telling you to go away.
Post reply on HN