Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Hollywood and the startup world enables nepo kids to lie to themselves and to the public about their "selfmade" status until they receive their ancestral Lordship from the King of England, and this fake meritocracy keeps everyone in line trying their best because one day you could be a billionaire, too. What about the exceptions? Doesn't that disprove the theory? You mentioned Hollywood. There has been a lot of mala…
The audience still recognizes talent, but talent is far from everything one needs to be successful. For every new star that suddenly "pops up everywhere" I recommend a journey through newspaper [0] and government archives based on their family names. Here [1] you can check if the family has their own island, e.g. Trump island near Seattle/Canada with historic Swastika/KKK-shaped house that accidentally burnt down in…
I mean you are welcome to prove me wrong but in my time during which I was interested in learning more about Inde Navarette, I have discovered a poorly curated Wikipedia article with minor incorrect info (she is not studying behavioral psychology) which seems to indicate minimal 'curation' and her family history is well documented as not coming from an entertainment background or wealth. This is despite going to #1 on the IMDB Star counter and her main social media platform(IG) going from what I suspect was ~200-300K followers to 3.5M in the course of ~two months.
You argument can be made about anyone but it goes into conspiracy theory.
Has there been a reduction in rags to riches stories, I would argue yes but one positive example in 2026 could disprove your original hypothesis.