Earlier quoted context omitted.
And then immediately wrote “I fully trust AI with these things”
But also wrote that he didn’t trust the humans behind the AI.
NYC may require landlords and realtors to disclose the use of AI in listings
91–100 of 285 posts
Re: NYC may require landlords and realtors to disclose the use of AI in listings
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not that I like the idea of it, but I could see adding furniture to empty apartment photos. A furnished apartment probably sells better than an empty one.
And photos of a furnished property give a better sense of the size of the space, and what can be done with it, than photos of empty rooms. (So long as the furnishings are sized realistically, of course.)
Re: NYC may require landlords and realtors to disclose the use of AI in listings
#93This is a frustrating trend with real estate agents on their MLS pictures. Sure, they have a disclaimer (most of the time) but at a thumbnail size as the lead image, it’s not possible to see it’s AI. Which leads to clicking on a complete BS listing.
Re: NYC may require landlords and realtors to disclose the use of AI in listings
#94There's several other areas that would be good to categorically ban AI usage from: - gambling - dating - hiring - advertising It shouldn't even be controversial that this would be broadly good for society. I say that as an AI maximalist: I fully trust AI with these things. I do not trust the humans using the AI.
Does basic photoshop count as AI usage...? What about changing color balance, dynamic range, etc?
Re: NYC may require landlords and realtors to disclose the use of AI in listings
#95Doesn't this already fall under consumer protection laws? False advertisement & consumer fraud.
Re: NYC may require landlords and realtors to disclose the use of AI in listings
#96Re: NYC may require landlords and realtors to disclose the use of AI in listings
#97Are protections really this weak in New York? Where I live even using Photoshop for real estate advertisements is illegal, nevermind AI.
Re: NYC may require landlords and realtors to disclose the use of AI in listings
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
What? Is your claim that every photo will be labeled as AI-modified, or that people won't label AI-modified images? If the latter, just penalize the listing agents. Trivial. The entire issue is that the platforms are already inundated with misleading, unlabeled AI-modified images.
Every photo will be AI-enhanced and correctly labeled as such. Just like every Web site has a cookie warning.
Re: NYC may require landlords and realtors to disclose the use of AI in listings
#99I’ve lived here for 30+ years, rented for more than 20 and why would anyone ever rent an apartment without seeing it in person?
That being said, IANAL but I imagine the rule is fully legal. The city already mandates a host of things: if the listing markets something as a 3BR, it needs to have 3 rooms bigger than 80 sq feet, each with an exterior window. If they say 3BR and it needs a wall to created the 3rd BR they have to put it up. If it says 2BR convertible 3BR, you might have to pay to have it put up.
Re: NYC may require landlords and realtors to disclose the use of AI in listings
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's super annoying, but this is a total nothing burger because he doesn't actually have any power to do anything here. This has also been a problem long before AI with "virtually staged" apartments.
> he doesn't actually have any power to do anything here. Landlords in nyc are doing business in nyc, which means the city can regulate them, does it not?