Live data from Hacker News

NYC may require landlords and realtors to disclose the use of AI in listings

petapixel.com

81–90 of 285 posts

Re: NYC may require landlords and realtors to disclose the use of AI in listings

#81
post #66

Wasn't that already implicitly the case? Aren't there laws against deceptive advertising? It sounds like an incredibly sensible rule. But is this something a mayor can just declare? Isn't this something aa legislative body has to decide?

It's exactly because there are laws against deceptive advertising that Mamdani can enact theses rules.

NYC's Administrative Code prohibits deceptive trade practices, false advertising, misleading representations made to customers, etc. It gives the NYC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection authority to execute those broad guidelines by enacting specific rules.

So Mamdani and the DCWP are basically saying, "City law gives us the authority to regulate this sort of thing, and because this is clearly in violation, here are the specific rules we're enacting to regulate it."

Re: NYC may require landlords and realtors to disclose the use of AI in listings

#82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Come on, there is no such thing as "trace amounts of AI" in a photo of a building.

Not that I like the idea of it, but I could see adding furniture to empty apartment photos. A furnished apartment probably sells better than an empty one.

Apartment advertisements are already doing this. With the caveat that the sense of scale (and literally everything about the apartment space tbh) can be entirely tampered with.

Oh yeah, this tiny apartment can definitely fit all this furniture. It’s not all ai generated at 2/3rds the size of any real furniture.

Re: NYC may require landlords and realtors to disclose the use of AI in listings

#87
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They said to ban AI usage in dating (sites, I assume)?

And then immediately wrote “I fully trust AI with these things”

But also wrote that he didn’t trust the humans behind the AI.

Re: NYC may require landlords and realtors to disclose the use of AI in listings

#88

Mamdani will be sued. It's a 1st amendment issue.

I am not a lawyer, but this seems unlikely. Federal law prohibits "false advertisement" which is understood to include misleading advertisements. Regulators can and do restrict certain types of commercial speech, and this kind of restriction has survived First Amendment challenge.

Re: NYC may require landlords and realtors to disclose the use of AI in listings

#89
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What? Is your claim that every photo will be labeled as AI-modified, or that people won't label AI-modified images? If the latter, just penalize the listing agents. Trivial. The entire issue is that the platforms are already inundated with misleading, unlabeled AI-modified images.

Every photo will be AI-enhanced and correctly labeled as such. Just like every Web site has a cookie warning.

This site doesn't. Many don't.

Re: NYC may require landlords and realtors to disclose the use of AI in listings

#90
post #6

How does this work? Seems more like a law but cities dont have legislatures. Or … ?

Cities in the US can pass laws. They're called local ordinances: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_ordinance#United_States

And the mayor just writes them?
Post reply on HN