Live data from Hacker News

Meta trying to destroy whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams, US senator says

theguardian.com

21–23 of 23 posts

Re: Meta trying to destroy whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams, US senator says

#21

It has been [0] days since the last report on nasty Meta shenanigans. On a related note, I believe (based on no evidence) that Zuckerberg knows of a lot more nasty dealings and wants to crucify Wynn-Williams to scare off any potential whistleblowers.

Honest question: If you have no evidence, then why do you believe it?

Zuckerberg is the kind of Incel we have been warned about. Its how the Face Book started and it will be how it will end.

Re: Meta trying to destroy whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams, US senator says

#22
post #3

If you loved Catch-22 you will love ”Careless people”! I warmly recommend a read. Not to support Sarah necessarily - just because the book is great! It’s not really a spill-the-tea as much absurdist escapade in corporate america. Ok the details on Zuckerberg and ”Lean In” Sandberg _are_ bizarre. Which makes it a super fun read.

I’m a bit over halfway through the book after purchasing it based off the premise alone and, I may be in the minority, but I find her insufferable and very naive. On more than one occasion makes comparisons to the lofty idealized and non pragmatic goals of governmental institutions like the UN and seems bewildered that a business like Meta doesn’t (obviously) have the same aspirations/alignment. She just reminds me o…

"insufferable and very naive."

IMHO she is just not from US. US culture _is_ totally foreign to anyone not from there.

Read the part where she describes her interactions with New Zealand prime minister and you will get it. That part to me feels natural (I'm from Finland). Everything else in the book reads like absurdist black comedy to me and not how I would expect people to behave normally.

Re: Meta trying to destroy whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams, US senator says

#23
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m a bit over halfway through the book after purchasing it based off the premise alone and, I may be in the minority, but I find her insufferable and very naive. On more than one occasion makes comparisons to the lofty idealized and non pragmatic goals of governmental institutions like the UN and seems bewildered that a business like Meta doesn’t (obviously) have the same aspirations/alignment. She just reminds me o…

I think yes, she is naive. She understands diplomacy, but is perpetually surprised by politics of the situation. But, if she was not naive, she would either leave much sooner or comfortably fit into the dark side. Also, when I read the description of the workplace, between dleep deprivation and isolation from non facebook people, everyone ends up in a bit of "cult group" thinking. That makes you even less likely to t…

TBH to me she reads as high performing idealist, not naive. Different things, may give similar signals.
Post reply on HN