Meta trying to destroy whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams, US senator says
1–10 of 23 posts
Re: Meta trying to destroy whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams, US senator says
#2Discussions:
Zuckerberg's Increasingly Bizarre War on Whistleblowers
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48698684
'Careless People' author claims Meta surveilled her for 12mos to enforce silence
Re: Meta trying to destroy whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams, US senator says
#3If you loved Catch-22 you will love ”Careless people”! I warmly recommend a read. Not to support Sarah necessarily - just because the book is great! It’s not really a spill-the-tea as much absurdist escapade in corporate america.
Ok the details on Zuckerberg and ”Lean In” Sandberg _are_ bizarre. Which makes it a super fun read.
Re: Meta trying to destroy whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams, US senator says
#4It has been [0] days since the last report on nasty Meta shenanigans.
On a related note, I believe (based on no evidence) that Zuckerberg knows of a lot more nasty dealings and wants to crucify Wynn-Williams to scare off any potential whistleblowers.
Re: Meta trying to destroy whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams, US senator says
#5It has been [0] days since the last report on nasty Meta shenanigans. On a related note, I believe (based on no evidence) that Zuckerberg knows of a lot more nasty dealings and wants to crucify Wynn-Williams to scare off any potential whistleblowers.
Honest question:
If you have no evidence, then why do you believe it?
Re: Meta trying to destroy whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams, US senator says
#6[flagged]
Re: Meta trying to destroy whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams, US senator says
#7It has been [0] days since the last report on nasty Meta shenanigans. On a related note, I believe (based on no evidence) that Zuckerberg knows of a lot more nasty dealings and wants to crucify Wynn-Williams to scare off any potential whistleblowers.
Honest question: If you have no evidence, then why do you believe it?
Because it is extremely unlikely she knew everything. Based on her book, she was last to learn quite a lot of ugly stuff she reports on - they told her only when they had to.
And she left long time ago. It is even more unlikely that the company magically became clean after her leaving.
Re: Meta trying to destroy whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams, US senator says
#8It has been [0] days since the last report on nasty Meta shenanigans. On a related note, I believe (based on no evidence) that Zuckerberg knows of a lot more nasty dealings and wants to crucify Wynn-Williams to scare off any potential whistleblowers.
Honest question: If you have no evidence, then why do you believe it?
Circumstantial plus expecting the worst.
A company and founder with such an extensive list of publicly known misdeeds (starting with Facesmash), chances are that there are many skeletons left to uncover. Setting a precedent is no unknown course of action.
It's not much to go by, but I am a commenter on HN, not a lawyer and Occam's razor doesn't disagree either.
Re: Meta trying to destroy whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams, US senator says
#9[flagged]
I learned a lot of new in that book. And the "she blames everyone but herself" is literally a lie.
Re: Meta trying to destroy whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams, US senator says
#10[flagged]
If there wasn’t anything interesting in it, we wouldn’t be hearing about Zuck’s continual effort to silence her.