[flagged]
Which do you recommend?
Telegram's t.me domain has been suspended
291–298 of 298 posts
Re: Telegram's t.me domain has been suspended
#292Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t mean to censor you here, but I disagree. If everything is censorship, then censorship becomes meaningless. Anyway, i gotta go censor something for breakfast, have a censor censor. Censor!
Censorship is when speech or publication is prevented. Hope this explanation helps.
Incidentally, taking down a domain used for short links doesn’t prevent speech or publication, since they have about 20 other domains that the same info is available at. Like how knocking over a newspaper box doesn’t censor the paper. So, by your own definition this isn’t censorship. Which is weird because it probably is censorship. Almost like your definition is bad.
Re: Telegram's t.me domain has been suspended
#293Re: Telegram's t.me domain has been suspended
#294Earlier quoted context omitted.
yeah, it is good! I hate usability features too!
You either have E2EE or you don't. If you have usability, you don't have E2EE.
counter point https://github.com/GrayHatter/toxcore/tree/multi-device (I guess technically you'd need https://github.com/uTox/uTox/tree/mdev too)
Re: Telegram's t.me domain has been suspended
#295Re: Telegram's t.me domain has been suspended
#296Re: Telegram's t.me domain has been suspended
#297Earlier quoted context omitted.
Technical failures are different from procedural ones (didn’t verisign blow up dot com or something years ago?). The future is domain resiliency - whether that’s via apps or other methods.
I currently check Wikipedia to find out the current domain for sites that are subject to frequent takedowns.
Re: Telegram's t.me domain has been suspended
#298Earlier quoted context omitted.
None do at present, AFAIK. But ccTLD could do that, if they wanted to; there is no rule against it, unlike the gTLDs.
That's weird there no such zones then. It would be nice to be able to pay for a domain 50 years in advance.