[flagged]
DEA to Temporarily Schedule 7-Oh and Related Substances to Protect Public Safety
71–80 of 199 posts
Re: DEA to Temporarily Schedule 7-Oh and Related Substances to Protect Public Safety
#72Kratom has been beneficial for me. Extracts can go but the leaf should stay.
Re: DEA to Temporarily Schedule 7-Oh and Related Substances to Protect Public Safety
#73Ah yeah surely banning more substances will be the end of the problem this time! It definitely won't just push anyone who got hooked on this non-lethal opioid towards unregulated black markets filled with lethal fentanyl... Fun fact, this is one of two """temporary""" opioid schedulings happening right now. The DEA is also banning 5,6-Dichloro Desmethylchlorphine (SR-17018), which has minimal to no recreational value…
Reading the document...
> In recent years, online forum users have begun to discuss recreational use of these four synthetic opioids and commonly compared these four synthetic opioids to other traditionally abused opioids, such as morphine and fentanyl (schedule II substances). However, unlike these two drugs that have FDA-approval for use in specific medical treatments, the four synthetic opioids have no currently approved medical use and, based on positive identifications of these four substances in forensic drug exhibits and toxicology samples, are likely to be trafficked and abused similarly to other synthetic opioids, such as brorphine (schedule I).
Re: DEA to Temporarily Schedule 7-Oh and Related Substances to Protect Public Safety
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
You have to provide ID and be over 21 to purchase nicotine. You can't advertise nicotine products. You have to be licensed to sell nicotine products. Same for alcohol. Restrictions on who can buy, who can sell, and how you can advertise and market. These are not the same as some random pill from a gas station sold to anyone with cash with zero regulations, safety, restrictions, or even any requirement to tell you wha…
When I was a kid, there were cigarette vending machines. I am not that old.
Better regulation, better enforcement, anti-smoking advertising campaigns, banning public smoking, and drastically reduced amongst youth and the general public.
Cigarette regulation to reduce smoking starting in the mid/late 90s is the poster child for public policy done well.
Re: DEA to Temporarily Schedule 7-Oh and Related Substances to Protect Public Safety
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
This was happening during the early 2000s, though in more "reputable" places (like nutrition and supplement stores; different "drugs" and chemicals, though). Not really surprised it is still going on in the weird little label producers.
You used to be able to find some wild stuff in GNC ~20 years ago, the 'pro-hormone' era was funny. All the cannabinoid analogs are a good example too, people just want to get high. I do miss salvia extracts though. Being able to pick that up in a head shop was nice before it got banned.
Re: DEA to Temporarily Schedule 7-Oh and Related Substances to Protect Public Safety
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
So is caffeine.
And sugar
Re: DEA to Temporarily Schedule 7-Oh and Related Substances to Protect Public Safety
#77Kratom is such an interesting drug. About 10 years ago, when it was less well-known, you could find better raw leaf powder and it was helping people get off actual opiates. IIRC there's an effect where the actual chemicals get stronger for older leaves. The bigger market has caused the harvest period to shorten, making the powder worse quality, and creating room for the concentrated extracts and stuff like 7-Oh. Trag…
Is there not universies that could just do this research on the leaf itself?
Re: DEA to Temporarily Schedule 7-Oh and Related Substances to Protect Public Safety
#78Re: DEA to Temporarily Schedule 7-Oh and Related Substances to Protect Public Safety
#79Anyone got a quick primer on what 7-Oh is? That's a new term for me and the web search doesn't seem reliable.
Re: DEA to Temporarily Schedule 7-Oh and Related Substances to Protect Public Safety
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
So is caffeine.
This is always mentioned when people talk about addictive substances being widespread. However, I think the key thing to think about isn't whether somethings addictive or not, but if said addiction comes with significant negative consequences/attributes. I don't think you'll find many people saying Caffeine is GOOD for you, but it just doesn't have significant negative outcomes like Tobacco.
"There is a wealth of accumulating biological, epidemiological and clinical evidence to support the further investigation of selective adenosine A2A antagonists, as well as caffeine, as promising candidate therapeutics to fill the unmet need for disease modification of PD."
1: https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/13/6/967 2: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33349580/