Live data from Hacker News

EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0

patrick-breyer.de

591–600 of 947 posts

Re: EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0

#591

Stupid parliamentary trick: Hold the vote on the day before the summer break - ensuring that many people have already returned to their home countries. Then use a sort of "reverse" parliamentary trick: the default is that this legislation is accepted. They needed an absolute majority - not of voting members, but of all members - to reject it. Result: 314 against, 276 in favor, 17 abstentions, 113 absent The EU is wel…

The internet is pretty stupid now and needs to be reigned in so our sons and daughters aren’t wide eyed zombies. Most of you won’t agree with me but it’s true and something needs to be done so I laud this.

Chat control doesn’t make the internet any less stupid.

Re: EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0

#592

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes. I see no reason to think otherwise.

What's the purpose of this law? Protecting the recipients or punishing the senders?

I don't know what the companies want with it. But they'll try to hide the logs in discovery for a lawsuit. [1]As nyt found out.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/07/openai-faked-ina...

Re: EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0

#593
post #430

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not only was Chat Control 1.0 already rejected twice by the European Parliament but: - This vote took place on last day of the session when many MEPs had already left for Summer vacation - 112 MEPs of 719 didn't vote. - The vote was called only two days before as an "Rule 170 - Urgent procedure" - 73 MEPs missed the vote making it "urgent". Normally it takes months of procedure to come up for a final vote.

That's why you have a constitution with rights that are not up for vote. Even relying on people to vote no is not enough.

We already have a constitution like that in Italy, not that anyone cares to enforce it though…

Re: EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0

#595

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know... I'm not European so I don't really care, but I feel like there are some jobs that have an existing overlap of _duty_. I was in the military, and PTO was viewed as a privilege, and sometimes leave was cancelled, but that makes sense because of the position. Other civilian jobs, like firefighters, police, maybe some medical practitioners, might have this same thing. Politicians I would say is definitely…

This is a deeply American (and Puritan) view of work, and I can say that as an American who works in public service. PTO is not a “privilege.” In fact, it is a documented right as part of the employment agreement your company makes you, when you sign that document about the handbook. It should be a legal agreement, but somehow we’ve convinced people their purpose in life is to work for 50-60 years for 40+ hours a wee…

id take ON CALL to mean that when an emergency happens like an emergency vote, they drop everything including vacation to go attend.

this doesn't seem like oncall?

Re: EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0

#596

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The US constitution doesn't grant rights. It's sort of the whole deal which the rest of the western world doesn't really understand, much less Americans themselves.

The US constitution is one of the few constitutions that _does_ grant rights[0]. [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bill_of_Rights

That is a list of restrictions on government power, not a grant.

Re: EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0

#597

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This narrative is a fabrication. EU spends 33% of World’s military spending, once you exclude US. EU spends more on military than China. How much do you need to spend to defend yourself, 60% of the world? Mind you, many western weapons, like stinger and javelin, cost more than their weight in silver. Sounds like a scam

Military spending != military capability and will to use force. For example, Germany spends way more than France on defense but has a less capable military and with no nuclear capability to boot. From force projection capability, the EU is toothless and lacks the spine to twist some arms in order to see its interests represented on the world stage. It's a pushover despite all that military. The reality is that you ne…

> the EU is toothless and lacks the spine to twist some arms in order to see its interests represented on the world stage.

The rhetoric right now is just bizarre. Why should the EU force countries against their will using military? Do you have zero idealism or regard for internationally agreed upon rules? Do you want a world where might is right?

Re: EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0

#598
I no longer hold the belief that The West is moral or good-faith actor. In my lifetime I've watch the state go from being relatively benign, to maintaining face, to all-out racket, corruption and anti-democratic behaviour. I sympathise with both left-wing and right-wing sentiment. The system no longer works by-and-for the people. Call it elite capture, call it communism. My view is we're dealing with a Janus-like system.

Re: EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0

#599

Earlier quoted context omitted.

for no apparent rason? the way they are preparing to bring the population into a war hardly can be any more apparent...

War is less imminent now than ever. Ukraine has caused a ton of damage to Russia and at this point the Kremlin has more to worry about than EU countries (pretty much every Russian government ever is brought down from within). No, leftist governments in the EU have failed to provide prosperity and failed in all their promises, now they're going for total control to try to stay in power. Look at France, as soon as Le P…

Are you calling Macron a "leftist"? It does help your argument because it's a tautology that "the leftists failed to provide prosperity" if the entire political spectrum counts as such.

Re: EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0

#600
post #430

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's why you have a constitution with rights that are not up for vote. Even relying on people to vote no is not enough.

Some European countries like Germany do, but the EU somehow can override those national constitutions.

It cannot. EU laws are completely useless and must be implemented by every government as a local law, which won't be more powerful than the constitution.

The problem is that constitutional courts should then say the law was against the constitution and cancel it, but will that happen?

Post reply on HN