Live data from Hacker News

Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives

howtogeek.com

181–190 of 289 posts

Re: Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives

#181
post #107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

how switching to an alternative like codeberg would prevent it? ti can be scraped as well

Quite a few commentors here mentioned using gitea or one of it's forks on a private tailnet. That would mean it isn't publicly available and can't be scraped.

That's where it's all goin'. Private, outta sight. Keep the 'bots out, an' you keep the man out.

Re: Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives

#182

+ predatory pricing hikes for AI + not honouring yearly commitments plans

I'm still paying $4 a month for GitHub since I keep some repos private, which was down from the $8 a month or whatever before Microsoft acquired GitHub, are you saying there's a price hike for AI services or something else?

In case you didn't know, you don't need to pay for private repos.

Re: Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives

#185

FYI that Codeberg is currently holding a vote to broadly ban projects written mostly using AI, so its not a neutral space for hosting your projects like GitHub: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/pulls/1253 https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116880003584050912

I've been on Codeberg for my projects since September but will pull them if this happens. I see no definition of what "mostly using AI" means and refuse to be "punished" for the choice of tooling I use. The tone and content of the thread on Mastodon is absolutely toxic. I'd rather self-host than deal with the ambiguity and threats. Invariably from people who don't even make anything. I have plenty of concerns around…

Same here, i've been on Codeberg since 2022 but if this passes, i'll most likely move my stuff elsewhere (my projects do not even have any AI code, i just dislike the idea of telling people what tools to use to make their own stuff).

I dislike GitHub and i'm using a shared host for my website which wouldn't let me install something like Forgejo (this is by choice as i don't want to bother with sysadmin stuff, my site is almost all static HTML with only a couple PHP scripts for some minor tasks). So i guess i'll be migrating to GitLab, even though i do not really like its UX. Or maybe i'll use some other Forgejo instance like CodeFloe. URLs aside, migrating between Forgejo instances should be easy.

Re: Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives

#187
post #79
post #15

Sentiment for/against GitHub aside... "Why X are doing Y" articles like these pretend that the premise of "X are doing Y" is true, conveniently skipping to the "Why" before proving that the premise is even accurate in any meaningful way. This is why I never buy headlines that start out with "Why". > developers are ditching Proceeds to list but a handful of remotely meaningful repos against the hundreds of thousands o…

> Proceeds to list but a handful of remotely meaningful repos against the hundreds of thousands on there The trend is what's interesting here. Github has never been threatened by anyone, because their service was too good to bother for everyone but the most ideologically motivated. Now their service has become so bad there's a github joke at work every time something is down or slower than it should. Reputation is a…

Wow. GitHub gaining the same reputation as DNS ("it's always DNS"), printers, OSI layer 8, and PEBKAC is actually a bit of an achievement.

Hat tip to Microsoft.

Re: Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives

#188
“Verifying you are human”

I’m gone.

Any site that does that. I’m gone. I’m not waiting around for your bullshit.

It’s so scammy and dumb looking anyway.

Cloudflare ruined half the web.

Codeberg might be cool? I’ll never know because they use Cloudflare.

Cloudflare makes me leave websites every day and never return to them.

Dumbest technology ever implemented. It’s joke anyway - DDoS is easily handled far more elegantly.

Re: Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives

#189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Proceeds to list but a handful of remotely meaningful repos I'm pretty sure, shortly after the motorized vehicle was made commercialy available, there were only a "handful of remotely meaningful" people and companies who stopped using horses. Do tell: How many horses are around on todays streets?

This is not an effective argument, given that these smaller services are uniformly retrograde in functionality.

When cars started replacing horses, they didn’t have more features. They just didn’t get sick or temperamental, and they didn’t shit all over the streets.

Re: Why developers are ditching GitHub for Codeberg and self-hosting alternatives

#190

I tried codeberg, used it a year, then early this year in all their wisdom codeberg decided to show adverserial random text instead of my repo, reporteldly to mess up llm training to user agents they weren't sure were human. Codeberg had one job, serve my repo, it didn't do that, when brought up, I was told it was a feature not a bug, they could maybe whitelist me but that wasn't my problem, it was that random people…

Is your complaint about Anubis? I see the "checking if you are human" kind of text too when going to codeberg, but it is usually only a second or two. It is because I run a bit of obfuscation and resistance to browser finger printing. But you find seeing the text for a couple of seconds too annoying to use codeberg? Maybe it is more than 2 seconds for you? Everyone has their views on what is acceptable in the world a…

I believe they're referencing iocaine[0], which I believe I've seen on codeberg before. I may be wrong though.

[0]: https://iocaine.madhouse-project.org/

Post reply on HN