Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's an ongoing one
Gaza? That’s the other ally
We're talking about the middle Kingdom here
Al Vigier: Canada's AI strategy shouldn't include secret Palantir bills
81–90 of 91 posts
Re: Al Vigier: Canada's AI strategy shouldn't include secret Palantir bills
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Palantir is elbow-deep in the Trump administration, the same one that has repeatedly threatened to annex Canada. That is not a threat to be taken lightly, and the Canadian public agrees Are they making any preparations for war, at all, that they weren't also doing in 2021?
Did the US make any preparations for war before abducting Maduro from Venezuela or before getting into a war with Iran that cost them freedom of passage in the Strait of Hormuz? Right up until Russia invaded Ukraine, Russia maintained that, no, that troop buildup wasn't meant as an invasion force, and a good chunk of the world believed Russia because it was a moronic idea to invade Ukraine. Trump is far more moronic…
What do you think your comment has to do with mine?
Re: Al Vigier: Canada's AI strategy shouldn't include secret Palantir bills
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because they are a communist country aligned with Russia.
They are no longer communist. Its state controlled capitalism with a tendency to personality cult, racism, and the destruction of minorities and the systematic destruction of minority cultures.
They are run by 'The Communist Party of China' and they certainly act communist, stop shilling.
Re: Al Vigier: Canada's AI strategy shouldn't include secret Palantir bills
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because they are a communist country aligned with Russia.
China is the most sensible current superpower. They are barely communist at all since Deng and have a better recent track record in terms of maintaining global trade. And at least in recent years they are probably the least worst super power in terms of imprisoning minorities. Oh and Premier Xi lives under your bed.
China is a communist country doing plenty of bad stuff, stop shilling. Winnie the Pooh does hide under my bed though.
Re: Al Vigier: Canada's AI strategy shouldn't include secret Palantir bills
#85Re: Al Vigier: Canada's AI strategy shouldn't include secret Palantir bills
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did the US make any preparations for war before abducting Maduro from Venezuela or before getting into a war with Iran that cost them freedom of passage in the Strait of Hormuz? Right up until Russia invaded Ukraine, Russia maintained that, no, that troop buildup wasn't meant as an invasion force, and a good chunk of the world believed Russia because it was a moronic idea to invade Ukraine. Trump is far more moronic…
What do you think your comment has to do with mine?
You were asking if the US was actually preparing to invade Canada, were you not?
Re: Al Vigier: Canada's AI strategy shouldn't include secret Palantir bills
#87Re: Al Vigier: Canada's AI strategy shouldn't include secret Palantir bills
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because it’s a company with no ethics beyond “might makes right,” owned by a person of dubious sanity who travels around the world to warn anyone who’ll listen about how the Antichrist is bad for their business. Why would anyone in their right minds do business with a company like that?
To be fair the Antichrist, being a prophesied entity from several millennia ago, is probably not super up to date on twenty-first-century business best practices. They probably still use waterfall.
The Antichrist is NOT a prophesied entity. There is no, "the Antichrist". Antichrist isn't even mentioned in the Book of Revelation.
Antichrist is only mentioned in the 1st and 2nd letters of John, where it refers to many antichrists (1 John 2:18), who are identifiable because they deny the Father and the Son (1 John 2:22), and that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh (2 John 1:7). The term simply means, 'against Christ', so anyone who is against Christ could be labelled such, even if they didn't match the description in 1st and 2nd John.
So antichrists existed when these letters of John were written and an innumerable number of them have existed over the past 2,000 years and exist even today. While antichrists would likely continue to exist while the events in Revelation occur, they are not described as having any role in the events described in Revelation.
The reason people link antichrist to the beast or false prophet in Revelation is not due to the writings in the New Testament stating that there is a link. It is more that any being who is against Christ, including those in Revelation, are likely to deny the Father and the Son and deny that Jesus came in the flesh, so, it isn't difficult to find numerous antichrists throughout the past 2,000 years that Christians could identify as being an antichrist and since, for each generation, their time was, to them, the end of time, because the future hadn't happened yet, it was easy for them to think of these antichrists as potentially being the beast or false prophet of the end times described in Revelation.
Over time, this traditional link between antichrist and the beast or false prophet became very strong, in spite of not being stated in scripture and more tradition has grown up around linking antichrist with the beast or false prophet, creating traditions upon traditions, upon traditions, not of which is substantiated by scripture or any other early writings from the Christian community.
Re: Al Vigier: Canada's AI strategy shouldn't include secret Palantir bills
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
You were asking if the US was actually preparing to invade Canada, were you not?
No, obviously not. Check out every other response I got.
You asked whether they were preparing for war, in response to a comment about the US threatening to annex Canada. How would people not think you were?
Re: Al Vigier: Canada's AI strategy shouldn't include secret Palantir bills
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, obviously not. Check out every other response I got.
You asked whether they were preparing for war, in response to a comment about the US threatening to annex Canada. How would people not think you were?
Just reading the comment would be a good start.
> in response to a comment about the US threatening to annex Canada
Work on your ability to determine what a sentence has in focus and what it doesn't.