Live data from Hacker News

Mexican government unveils a prototype for a new homegrown, ultra-affordable EV

gizmodo.com

211–217 of 217 posts

Re: Mexican government unveils a prototype for a new homegrown, ultra-affordable EV

#211
post #33

The Ford CEO is not wrong. Allowing foreign imports into the country at prices far below what US producers are able to make will decimate the local car industry in the US. There are 4 possible solutions to this problem; a) convince Americans that it's worth paying more for a locally built product. This is the simplest approach, but there's only so much margin here that the consumer will tolerate. At the moment this g…

This seems to fill a useful niche, but may be too downscale. Remember the Tata Nano.[1] Tata built a basic car with a price below 1 lahk, but it didn't sell. In the US, there's Slate, which claims to be making a small electric pickup truck. "Preorders will start on June 24, 2026. First deliveries are slated for late 2026." [2] Price in the US$20K range, they claim. Claimed range is 150m with the base model battery. A…

I wanted to buy a Tata Nano but unfortunately didn't make it to my country at an affordable price.

I think the demand was there, the supply wasn't.

My country, Uruguay, leads in EV adoption, and some small EVs are absolutely selling like hotcakes, a friend has the BAW Pony and I'd buy it if I had a place to charge it (there's issues with chargers inside condos due to fire risks).

170 km is plenty for city and suburban driving.

https://bawauto.com/pony/

Re: Mexican government unveils a prototype for a new homegrown, ultra-affordable EV

#212

This vehicle is what most Americans would call a "golf cart". If it doesn't have safety features and can't be driven on highways, it's not really competing with normal cars, so I'm not quite sure the article's analysis makes sense.

It makes 100% sense for a Mexican commute, or in other parts of South America.

I live in Uruguay and one of the best selling cars here is pretty similar, a friend has it and it's great for the daily commute:

https://bawauto.com/pony/

The best sellers are BYD models, which are a bit larger but still tiny by US standards.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BYD_Seagull

EVs have displaced ICE cars in Uruguay, and we usually are ahead of the trends, so I expect that to be the case in Europe and other places in coming years.

Re: Mexican government unveils a prototype for a new homegrown, ultra-affordable EV

#213

This vehicle is what most Americans would call a "golf cart". If it doesn't have safety features and can't be driven on highways, it's not really competing with normal cars, so I'm not quite sure the article's analysis makes sense.

It makes 100% sense for a Mexican commute, or in other parts of South America. I live in Uruguay and one of the best selling cars here is pretty similar, a friend has it and it's great for the daily commute: https://bawauto.com/pony/ The best sellers are BYD models, which are a bit larger but still tiny by US standards. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BYD_Seagull EVs have displaced ICE cars in Uruguay, and we usually a…

Both of these other cars are capable of driving at highway speeds, even if only barely in the Pony's case. The Olinia Uno is limited to 50km/h, and my understanding (I've had trouble finding clear details, although my Spanish isn't great) is that it's also going to lack safety features that a faster car would be required to have.

Re: Mexican government unveils a prototype for a new homegrown, ultra-affordable EV

#214

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The companies shifted production abroad because they didn't want to pay for US labor. That's not true. Reality is far more nuanced than that. Sadly, it is the equivalent of a bunch of Dodo birds falling off a cliff. And this applies to every industry, not just automobiles. The simplified version goes something like this: Three companies manufacture forks and knives in the US. They share the market equally. Each has…

How is this not a longer way of saying companies didn’t want to pay for American labour?

It isn't.

The "didn't want to pay for American labour" idea is a false reality. Nobody makes decisions like that. This is preposterous.

Business decisions are made against the competitive landscape. In that chess game, if you can come up with a way to deliver the same goods for less --regardless of where they are made-- you could win greater market share, beat your competitors, etc. That's it. There is no "I don't want to pay for labor" in that decision.

Also, the mechanism I explained is one where once there's a first mover in an industry, it quickly becomes a chain reaction from there. There's no explicit plan or malice at all on the part of those who are facing a binary choice: do the same or shut down the business.

Here's an example that has nothing to do with China (at least now): Software manufacturing.

Companies are having to face competitors who, using AI, are able to manufacture software faster and with less people. We know this isn't smooth sailing yet, but it is happening and it is the way this is going to go.

If you run a software company and your competitors are using AI effectively with less people, all else being equal, you have a few options:

  1- Adopt AI and lower your head count
  2- Double (or more) your head count to be able to keep up
  3- Hire a large team at a region with lower costs
  4- Give up and shut down the company
On #3: Your competitors can do the same thing and still use AI to beat you. You are not playing the game against NPC's, they can make decisions and change the dynamic as much as you can.

Yeah, sure, you can add features, try to deliver a better product, etc. At the end of the day, a shop using AI well will be able to replicate everything you can throw at the market, do it quickly and at a lower cost.

So, that's it. It isn't that you are saying "I don't want to pay software engineer wages". It's a competitive environment that forces decisions on you.

Someone once told me: A business is a living organism that tells you what you are going to do every day. You don't have the control you think you have.

I was young and stupid and did not understand what he said so many decades ago. Over time I would learn he was 100% correct.

Someone without the experience of running a non-trivial business likely isn't equipped to understand the hundreds of variables that drive the beast as you try to ride it and stay on top. From the context of someone with this experience, the single variable "don't want to pay labor" idea is nothing less than, to be kind, completely inaccurate.

Re: Mexican government unveils a prototype for a new homegrown, ultra-affordable EV

#215
post #185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The companies shifted production abroad because they didn't want to pay for US labor. That's not true. Reality is far more nuanced than that. Sadly, it is the equivalent of a bunch of Dodo birds falling off a cliff. And this applies to every industry, not just automobiles. The simplified version goes something like this: Three companies manufacture forks and knives in the US. They share the market equally. Each has…

.. and the consumers get cheaper goods. This debate is as old as Adam Smith, or older. I think the examples he used were centered around textiles? Everyone was afraid of the new job-destroying looms. > This destroyed jobs by the millions. And here we are. US unemployment has been about 5% for a while. If you look back on the graph: https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/civilian-une... , there are two big ou…

> US unemployment has been about 5%

Anyone who has studied and actually used statistics beyond toy exercises understands how these single variable statements are 100% misplaced. I won't go into the details because it might be pointless and I have to get work done. The main point is that grabbing this magical single variable 5% unemployment number to explain 50 years of deindustrialization is, well, nonsensical.

It's like the old example about the fallacy of averages being applied to the entire sample: A billionaire and a minimum wage worker walk into a room. Someone comments that the average net worth in that room is half a billion dollars.

Right.

Re: Mexican government unveils a prototype for a new homegrown, ultra-affordable EV

#216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tarfis seem to be the only way out. Everyone laughed when Trump did it, now EU is doing the same.

Everyone laughed at Trump because what he did was stupid. Selective tariffs have always made sense in certain contexts and have never been controversial.

This is not political or even about Trump.

I manufacture products. I have been in manufacturing for decades. These are products with electronics, mechanical assemblies, software, etc.

I used to manufacture in the US. For a while, this worked out OK.

The competitors started to move production to China, one by one.

I continued to manufacture here, lowered my prices, which lowered my margins, but I accepted that against keeping people employed here.

At some point this was not sustainable and I had to layoff a few people. I bought subassemblies made in China for less and continued to assemble in the US.

That, too, became unsustainable.

Today, I have no choice but to manufacture in China. There is no way. None. No path. No way to manufacture in the US (or Europe). The supply chain is gone, it does not exist here. Our insistence in committing suicide by raising minimum wage instead of lowering our costs (lower taxes, investing in reindustrialization, etc.) has made it impossible to manufacture here. I can't pay someone $25/hour to put screws into holes or push cables into connectors. Not when everyone else is paying a very small fraction of that manufacturing in China and customers will not pay double or triple for the same product.

Do tariffs help?

I am sure that, in the mid term (a few years) they probably help a few industries. What they don't do and can't do is materially expand our industrial base. My opinion is that we have already gone too far and this is impossible to bring back.

What would we have to do to fix it?

In short, the impossible.

We would have to implement almost zero taxes, materially reduce or eliminate minimum wage, materially reduce or eliminate regulatory burden across the board, heavily subsidize a planned re-industrialization strategy and actually execute at scale and at speed.

Importantly, we would have to also create a large cultural change away from the crazy anti-business mentality that seems to prevail in certain circles and towards a maniacal entrepreneurial culture. We would have to put in systems, tools and funding to support entrepreneurship at levels that have never been seen in this country.

Again, the impossible.

And, if we actually did this we would have to sustain it for at least 25 years and, with luck, we could come out ahead.

My go-to example of just how bad things have gotten is the insanity of the California high speed train project. This is emblematic of just how badly this nation has degraded.

Re: Mexican government unveils a prototype for a new homegrown, ultra-affordable EV

#217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I see this take on SUVs all the time, and I can't help but think it's wrong. Americans just like bigger vehicles and will downsize if gas gets too expensive. There's a reason almost all electric car companies start off with a CUV/SUV/truck, and it's not because they're allergic to sedans or coupes.

Idk if I'd say that Americans like bigger vehicles. There are just a lot of incentives that push us that way.

My incentive is that I want to walk into the car without fighting gravity much. I don't want big, but I do like tall. My GTI days are over, it's life, the knees say so.
Post reply on HN