Earlier quoted context omitted.
> They could just force them to provide Mythos to the federal government The DPA only gives that power to the President [1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Production_Act_of_1950
Maybe GP was treating Trump to the royal "they"
NSA lost access to Mythos amid Anthropic dispute
21–30 of 308 posts
Re: NSA lost access to Mythos amid Anthropic dispute
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
You misunderstand - the government issued a directive to Anthropic that effectively forced them to pull access from everyone, even their own employees.
The directive was to remove access to non-Americans, not to pull access from everyone. It’s because Anthropic cannot verify the identity of its users that it pulled access from everyone, not because the government explicitely requested that.
Did Hegseth pull his supply-chain risk BS?
Re: NSA lost access to Mythos amid Anthropic dispute
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah... NSA literally has MITM proxies/interception of any traffic they want inside every major US tech company (based on my reading/following of Snowden leaks and others). Anthropic wouldn't be able to exist without implicit NSA approval. This article reads more like a marketing piece for Anthropic/Mythos... and ends by talking about how much NSA wants Anthropic models. Propaganda.
> NSA literally has MITM proxies/interception of any traffic they want inside every major US tech company No, they don't.
Re: NSA lost access to Mythos amid Anthropic dispute
#24dozens upon dozens fired for no reason
so US "intelligence" is going to go even further backwards
* https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/trump-acting-ch...
November is going to be insanity
Re: NSA lost access to Mythos amid Anthropic dispute
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
The current position seems to be no-one has access, not even Anthropic employees. What powers does the US government have to force them to provide access? If they have that power why did they not use it to force them to provide their products for military use?
> What powers does the US government have to force them to provide access? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Production_Act_of_1950 This would not be a particularly big stretch here, either.
Re: NSA lost access to Mythos amid Anthropic dispute
#26Re: NSA lost access to Mythos amid Anthropic dispute
#27They could easily take the weights if they wanted. I don't believe they meaningfully lost access.
Re: NSA lost access to Mythos amid Anthropic dispute
#28Doesn't make any sense. They could just force them to provide Mythos to the federal government.
Yeah... NSA literally has MITM proxies/interception of any traffic they want inside every major US tech company (based on my reading/following of Snowden leaks and others). Anthropic wouldn't be able to exist without implicit NSA approval. This article reads more like a marketing piece for Anthropic/Mythos... and ends by talking about how much NSA wants Anthropic models. Propaganda.
Re: NSA lost access to Mythos amid Anthropic dispute
#29Re: NSA lost access to Mythos amid Anthropic dispute
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
> NSA literally has MITM proxies/interception of any traffic they want inside every major US tech company No, they don't.
It's back to the question of how much you should give the benefit of doubt to powerful people who openly lie.
If I have a box at Digital Ocean and I'm communicating with it with TLS1.3 using a Let's Encrypt cert that I generated, where, exactly, does this magical MITM box come into play?