Live data from Hacker News

W Social, public institutions and the theater of European digital sovereignty

blog.elenarossini.com

31–40 of 176 posts

Re: W Social, public institutions and the theater of European digital sovereignty

#31
> Europe already has an ATproto social network - Eurosky - run by a non-profit foundation - Modal - that is building everything in the open, with full transparency, sharing all the steps in their development roadmap:

And weirdly, there was never a peep about this in the press - while the W Social launch was on national news and a bunch of high-profile EU politicians immediately joined. What's going on here?

Re: W Social, public institutions and the theater of European digital sovereignty

#32
post #3

I don't understand why anyone would want to make the same mistake all over again: jumping onto a private platform owned by a company inevitably results in you becoming the product sold and enshittification. We've seen it so many times. Learn the lesson. Use Mastodon this time.

Nobody important or worth following uses Mastodon. Also Mastodon is on the road to enshittification since the previous CEO and founder bowed out for $1M using donations and the main instance federates with Meta's Threads. The other instances are out of the question since one rogue instance owner can lock and shutdown that instance.

I, for one, want to choose for myself whether to block other instances or not. You seem to not tolerate this opinion.

A "main instance" is contrary to the whole idea of a Fediverse anyway.

Re: W Social, public institutions and the theater of European digital sovereignty

#33
post #31

> Europe already has an ATproto social network - Eurosky - run by a non-profit foundation - Modal - that is building everything in the open, with full transparency, sharing all the steps in their development roadmap: And weirdly, there was never a peep about this in the press - while the W Social launch was on national news and a bunch of high-profile EU politicians immediately joined. What's going on here?

It means that marketers won over technical, factual people.

Re: W Social, public institutions and the theater of European digital sovereignty

#34
post #19
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd go further - just leave social media

No, not necessarily. Mastodon is actually "social media", as opposed to twitter/X, bluewhatever, facebook, or any other commercial outlet, to be honest, all of these have become "feeds" of promoted content designed to maximize "engagement". Mastodon is social: you follow people, you see their stuff. It's what social media used to be.

Fyi it’s actually called bluesky, not bluewhatever

Re: W Social, public institutions and the theater of European digital sovereignty

#35
post #22

> Europe already has an ATproto social network - Eurosky Why is this a different network? Are Eurosky relays not indexing anything outside Eurosky?

They are, it's just a second instance of a realy. For independance, resilience, moderation, and also probably minor technical choices.

Re: W Social, public institutions and the theater of European digital sovereignty

#36
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And what is that experience of yours? Do you have experience from deployments with many independent atproto data servers and relays federating together? Or do you have experience from bluesky, meaning you're only interacting with one central server and none of the complexities of federation come into play?

That’s like saying that someone using Google Reader doesn’t “experience federation of RSS”. Yes, my experience using the Bluesky app includes the Bluesky app server aggregating from many independent PDS hosts (because people I follow like that). But it doesn’t show up in user experience because that’s the whole point . And yes, I can use another aggregator instead of the Bluesky app, or even use a client which has no…

And it works as smoothly for people on other app servers?

Re: W Social, public institutions and the theater of European digital sovereignty

#38
post #4

An unfortunate step backwards. I'm cheering for Eurosky and open networks.

Eurosky actually looks like a promising alternative (speaking as non-european) but the AT protocol should have more open friendly competition than just the flagship instance of bluesky. Eurosky seems interesting as well.

Re: W Social, public institutions and the theater of European digital sovereignty

#39
post #22

> Europe already has an ATproto social network - Eurosky Why is this a different network? Are Eurosky relays not indexing anything outside Eurosky?

The article explains what's needed to run something like Bluesky (ctrl-f "To be fully sovereign you need").

My understanding is that Eurosky aims to be a non-profit ran alternative, hosted in EU. It integrates with Bluesky seamlessly (Bsky users and EUSky users can interact) but would keep working if Bluesky was taken down. I believe it also gives Eurosky agency when it comes to moderation.

Post reply on HN