Live data from Hacker News

Anna's Archive hit with $19.5M default judgment and global domain takedown order

torrentfreak.com

241–246 of 246 posts

Re: Anna's Archive hit with $19.5M default judgment and global domain takedown order

#241
post #237

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> There is a long history [...] that you will not find documented. Then how do you know about it? This sounds extremely made up.

I've literally experienced torture first hand. It's not just the drug trade, and torture isn't even the primary focus of the technology.

What torture did you experience, by whom and why?

Re: Anna's Archive hit with $19.5M default judgment and global domain takedown order

#242
post #238

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To be clear, your claim is that 'much of the drug trade is r[u]n less than consensually' via some kind of undocumented, unknown-to-most brain implant that can be used to remotely torture people for non-compliance? That claim falls apart as soon as it touches reality: there are a _lot_ of people who are involved in the drug trade, now and in the past. At some point, one of those people would definitely have had a CT o…

>At some point, one of those people would definitely have had a CT or an MRI on their skull The tech is adversarially designed, you're assuming the medical supply chains are not compromised, and are dramatically underestimating the sophistication involved here generally. You can't even assume the people interpreting the results are uncompromised, are trained to interpret results in the context of adversarial technolo…

Post some links, or keywords.

Re: Anna's Archive hit with $19.5M default judgment and global domain takedown order

#243
post #234

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

At least with scientific articles, the authors get precisely zero of the money that people pay for them. As for publishers, why should they be getting billions of dollars for putting up a PDF file on a website?

Uh, this is the authors' choice. They don't have to cut any deal with the publishers.

If they want to hold out for some big (or even small) payout, they have every right to do so. But they don't. Why? Because it's the best deal available for the scientists. The journal publishers actually do something. And if you think you can do it for much less, I hope you will step forward and help humanity.

There are so many sanctimonious piracy defenders here. If they really believe what they say, someone could easily step forward and slap together a website for next to nothing.

Re: Anna's Archive hit with $19.5M default judgment and global domain takedown order

#244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So far root servers haven’t done stuff to ccTLDs

But they can if they want, which is what power is.

Eh, kinda? I mean they do that then countries will work around root servers. It’s basically MAD doctrine.

Re: Anna's Archive hit with $19.5M default judgment and global domain takedown order

#245

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The price for that storage system will be far more dominated by drive prices than by the cost of the NAS box itself. Drive prices have approximately doubled in my area vs. 2 years ago. This is also generally a selfish attitude where you personally benefit while structures that used to benefit society at large are eroded.

> price for that storage system will be far more dominated by drive prices...doubled in my area vs. 2 years ago. Absolutely. To get 1/8 PB = 125 TB home library "easily": We'll use 8 disks in the 125TB library. Between RAID 5 (1 disk lost OK to recover) vs RAID 6 (2 disks lost OK to recover), choose RAID 6 (our disks could fail at same time if of similar production or unlucky). RAID6 means 25% of space used for parit…

> But it's like owning another car

Well, yes, but it is in fact owning a copy of approximately 10% of all human knowledge ever produced. Someone doing this is clearly doing it for reasons other than personal consumption.

Re: Anna's Archive hit with $19.5M default judgment and global domain takedown order

#246

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Books might have once been seen as luxuries, and the idea of a lending library allowed those in poverty to get a taste of wealth, so to speak... but they get dumped into landfills by the truckload today and can be had for pennies (or fractions of pennies, actually). Well those ones might be, but the ones I want sure aren't. I have to moderate my book-purchasing to avoid over-spending. The library is pretty helpful (r…

> I have to moderate my book-purchasing to avoid over-spending. I sympathize, but do it smarter. I downloaded 500 or so last week, and it was a slow week. Mostly I mine Hacker News and /pol/ (it's actually only half as bad as reddit once you ignore Mein Kampf) for recommendations... but ran a little short on those. Coming up with new titles to procure is tough. >I guess where this train of thought is going is to poin…

Physical sales are dead.

Well, 80% of sales are physical rather than digital. In what way is that dead?

The evidence indicates that you are incorrect, and while I appreciate your passion, if I must choose between you and reality, reality wins.

Post reply on HN