Live data from Hacker News

Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

anthropic.com

381–390 of 519 posts

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#381
post #115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Nazi feels like a close enough shorthand for “person who posts white nationalist and antisemitic views, supports authoritarian regimes, and seig heils on stage.”

Oh so like this?

https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/world/zohran-mamdani-faces-ma...

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#382

Oh. Just as I'm in the process of migrating to Pi+Qwen (local). This was probably going to be my last month on the Pro sub as I'm seriously fed up with the limits and degradation that started weeks after I signed up. Let's see how this shakes out.

How does Pi+Qwen (local) compare to Anthropic's offerings? Surely you're not getting the same breadth and quality of output using Qwen? How is the performance?

It’s a toy compared to Opus or Sonnet. Obviously the 5 trillion parameter models running on $$$$ hardware is going to outperform a local model.

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#383
post #155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

xAI removed its illegal gas turbines and obtained permits for the others only after being sued by the Southern Environmental Law Center. They then built another unpermitted site (Colossus 2) across the state line in Mississippi, and they are being sued again. [0] "The company began operations at its first site, Colossus 1, in June of 2024 and used as many as 35 unpermitted gas turbines to power the facility. Despite…

[flagged]

If you are burning that much fuel it needs to have emissions regulations. How would you feel if 20 miles upwind of you somebody fired up a few hundred random gas generators and kept them running 24/7 with no emission controls on them, rather than using utility power which is far cleaner and more efficient?

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#384

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Source? I'd like to read more on Anthropic's views of space compute

> As part of this agreement, we have also expressed interest in

Which is now their official position I guess as this whole “AI space datacenter” stuff is a significant part of the whole SpaceX IPO.

I assume privately they may not share that opinion, but it’s not in Anthropic’s interest to talk about this (very little to gain, and may ruffle a lot of feathers if they say the wrong thing).

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#385

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Pretty smart for SpaceX though. They’re turning an asset they made for a money-pit (Grok) into probably a major source of revenue ahead of their IPO.

We all remember 2 weeks ago when SpaceX bought $10B of Cursor services. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47855293 Since Cursor often relies on Claude models, some of those services will flow back to their own datacenter compute. Especially if there's, lets call it, "customer demand loadbalancing optimization agreements" that makes those Cursor services prioritize Claude models using the app keys that get load-bal…

It's the circle jerk economy.

Companies appear to be spending endless billions on AI but ultimately it's a huge wank.

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#386
post #192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Anyone who has googled just once to ask if datacenters in space make any sense, has found out they don't because they can't get rid of heat. That leaves only two kinds of people left who are still talking excitedly about datacenters in space: The uninformed and the grifters.

SpaceX have presented on this and it's fairly straightforward and they already do it with starlink satellites, just at a larger scale. Sound like you are the uniformed one (or an EDS victim)

Why did we start saying EDS this week, just in time for the IPO?

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#388
post #337
post #226

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your argument is that since it is common in a bubble to make circular deals, there is no conspiracy. But you seem to suggest that people committing tens of billions of dollars aren’t looking any further down the pipeline than the name on the receiving bank account? Have you ever been anywhere near a large deal?

That's a lot to imply from my simple comment. My viewpoint is actually the exact opposite of what you claim: it all feels like a house of cards that is set to collapse at any moment. I can also tell you're quite passionate about this and I wonder if that emotion is clouding your interpretation of what was meant to be an innocuous comment. My point was that there is a lot of this happening, it is not a unique statemen…

> I made no attempt to dismiss or justify any of it.

> I don't think it's the conspiracy theory that you're making it out to be.

Which is it then?

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#390

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But like... most companies are so short of GPUs they'd run it on anything. SpaceXAI not needing the compute is not really a good sign imo.

Are you worried about Google too? They're selling compute. Same with Microsoft, and Amazon. As far as I know Anthropic is really the only one that's compute-bound.

Amazon is a compute specialist, their competitive advantage is in the compute business. And conversely they're not really trying to play in the AI business, so it's not at all suspicious that they don't want to use all their compute themselves.

I am worried about Google and Microsoft, yes.

Post reply on HN