Live data from Hacker News

Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

anthropic.com

191–200 of 519 posts

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#191
post #49

Doubling the five-hour rate limits is merely a marketing stunt if the weekly rates are not also doubled. It simply means that you can reach the weekly limits in three days instead of five.

Exactly, the weekly limits are the real limiting factor. If you really push it, you can easily hit the weekly $200/mo Max limit in a day.

5 hours were the painful ones. If you're hitting your weekly you've outgrown the sub and should use extra billing

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Help me understand why not? I know solar power generation in space, and "beaming" the power back, was a naive idea. But this would actually use the power up there, mostly for training, but also for inference. That claim seems reasonable. I have zero knowledge of the economics of launching and maintaining satellites though.

As I understand it, the problem is cooling. There isn't any medium to take away the heat, so the only option is to slowly radiate it away.

Anyone who has googled just once to ask if datacenters in space make any sense, has found out they don't because they can't get rid of heat.

That leaves only two kinds of people left who are still talking excitedly about datacenters in space: The uninformed and the grifters.

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#193
post #49

Doubling the five-hour rate limits is merely a marketing stunt if the weekly rates are not also doubled. It simply means that you can reach the weekly limits in three days instead of five.

I've found with opus 4.6 which im still stubbornly using i can burn about 10% of the weekly within a 5 hour window with my workflow. Mentally i think about the weekly usage in terms of usage per day so about 14% per day which results in me not using that much early in the week so i can kinda "burn freely" later on. which leads me to a spot where usually on the final two days im sorta thinking about how can i expend t…

> Mentally i think about the weekly usage in terms of usage per day so about 14% per day

20%, there are 5 work days in a week, not 7.

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#194
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think so, but that's also really great because I frequently run into the five hour caps, but very rarely use my entire weekly allotment. There are lots of situations where I do things like write the plan for all the work that has to get done, and then set a reminder to execute the plan after I get home, when I'm done making dinner (because e.g. my five hour cap ends at 6pm). Higher caps for the five hour period is…

I (and many others) are the opposite. I run out of quota is 4-5 days. Generally no issues with the 5hr cap. ($200 sub)

Like 90% of people I know never hit their weekly but they hit their hourly. I'd bet your case is way rarer.

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#195
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Billions in revenue just before your IPO isn't a bad deal either.

The icing on the cake for Elon is that it strengthens the competition to OpenAI. Or is that actually his main motivation. Hard to know. Either way it's a win win win for him.

That's certainly one way one could spin this.

I guess loosing a ton of money then trying to get some if it back makes you a genius...

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Plot twist but makes perfect sense for both companies. Anthropic gets the compute they so desperately need to keep growing. Elon rents out compute that xAI couldn't make use of due to little demand for Grok. SpaceX gets revenue on the books for IPO. PS. I want to translate this part: We’re very intentional about where we’ll add capacity—partnering with democratic countries whose legal and regulatory frameworks suppor…

> funded by Middle East non-democratic governments What's the problem here exactly? Are you insinuating any non-democratic government is bad and evil and only democratic governments are the correct and right way to govern? sort of like: "there is only one true prophet, and it's the one I follow, and all the others are false!"

Yes, especially in the context of supporting US imperialism and capitalists interests (perpetual war + extraction machine) over what would actually benefit Americans: peace + cooperation initiatives. Something also tells me that American civilians would rather cooperate with peaceful governments than those that feed the blood machine.

America could do so much to compel the world to work in from a human rights perspective rather than petrodollars. I can't imagine any serious person would say the average American benefits from US imperialism. All US politicians did was traded away were secure middle class lifestyle for cheaper widgets, hardly anything worth caring about.

Who benefits from American petrodollar policies? Not Americans, all the wealth gets extracted to the elites while civilians suffer from the imperial blowback/boomerang.

Look at what the new deal coalition brought in and they nearly burnt out enough to allow neoliberalism to flourish during their fall. What do we have in return? No universal healthcare, no universal childcare, a broken welfare system, increasing income inequality, losing the ability to make a better life.

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#197
post #111
post #14

Anthropic renting out the data center Elon built for Grok is the kind of plot twist you can't make up.

It was pretty obvious to me that the merger was a way of quietly shutting xAI down in a way that keeps investors happy. With it also being used as a vehicle to offload the Twitter debt to the public, he certainly has good accountants.

Why would they spend 10B and potentially 60B in cursor if they were to shut xAI down? And I'm pretty sure Elon wants to have a model of his own, even if weaker, so it's "not woke".

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#198
post #25

> As part of this agreement, we have also expressed interest in partnering with SpaceX to develop multiple gigawatts of orbital AI compute capacity. Anthropic is either taking this space business more serious than the general public, or posting this sentence was part of the deal to get the compute.

most of the big tech ceos have mentioned this.

Most big tech CEOs are people that only "succeeded" due to have an unregulated monopoly or picking the right lotto ticket and not due to any innate above average intelligence. Go look at the 100s of billions in wasted capital and tell me who benefitted from such waste while workers + children suffer from lack of medical care.

You honestly expect this trajectory to continue unabated?

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#200
post #192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As I understand it, the problem is cooling. There isn't any medium to take away the heat, so the only option is to slowly radiate it away.

Anyone who has googled just once to ask if datacenters in space make any sense, has found out they don't because they can't get rid of heat. That leaves only two kinds of people left who are still talking excitedly about datacenters in space: The uninformed and the grifters.

The area you need in radiators is only half the area you need in solar panels. So it's definitely not a deal breaker.

Its still very dumb because of economics, logistics, serviceability and more.

Post reply on HN