Live data from Hacker News

Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

anthropic.com

121–130 of 519 posts

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#121
post #14

Anthropic renting out the data center Elon built for Grok is the kind of plot twist you can't make up.

Pretty smart for SpaceX though. They’re turning an asset they made for a money-pit (Grok) into probably a major source of revenue ahead of their IPO.

Its not even that. Its better to be involved in the game with a leader/help out a competitor who is competing against someone you don't like and don't want them to win, than to sit it out.

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#122
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have never come close to my weekly limit, but have hit my hourly limit frequently.

Same. I hit limits after 45 minutes. I'm on a measly Pro plan. I'm usually building small, open source projects, often from scratch. I only work on these projects in a 2-hour window in the morning. This is my "free time" development. I hope this change helps, because I was days away from switching back to Codex, though I like Claude Code a bit better these days. I also hope that the fact I had OpenClaw in my sandbox…

Are you using haiku for most tasks? I'm in the Google ecosystem so I'm curious how it is on the other side.

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#123
post #84
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For me it's the opposite. I almost never hit hourly limit, but I hit weekly limit in about 5 days.

What does your usage look like day to day? Are you using a low level amount all day long? I'm with the others here, I've never hit the weekly limit ever, only the hourly, and I consider myself a heavy user.

I dedicate a significant amount of time to defining the precise actions that agents should perform (PRD/ADR). I break down the feature sets into Milestones and slices (tasks). These tasks are small, well-defined, and scoped. I have a prompt template that the “architect” agent prepares whenever I want to initiate a new feature. This ensures that the prompt structure remains consistent and standardized over time. The generated prompt is then pasted to the “orchestrator,” which performs context discovery (using Repoprompt) and finalizes the plan then proceeds to launch subagents to do the work.

Based on the size and complexity of the task, as well as any inter-task dependencies, the orchestrator deploys one or more subagents (sometimes 5 or 6 subagents) to work on these mini tasks. Once all tasks are completed, the orchestrator initiates verification and launches a review workflow. This workflow uses the original prompt, acceptance criteria, repository internal guidelines, and relevant skills to conduct a thorough review of the agents’ work.

Typically, there are one or two review iterations, during which the review agent identifies any issues. Sometimes, I may also notice issues and have to "steer" the orchestrator. The time required for a slice to complete ranges from 30 minutes to 4 or 5 hours, depending on its size, complexity, and the number of subtasks it contains.

Only if I run about 3 such orchestration in parallel I can reach hourly limit.

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#124

Reading the comments here again surprises me how in an anti-Elon bubble most folks are. They are renting out spare Colossus 1 capacity. Colossus 2 is still coming online. Orbital data centers are really the plan in the next few years. XAi is still behind, but not a disaster considering how late they entered (and Elon’s unfortunate fixation on anime characters). SpaceX is extremely uniquely positioned to crush the res…

> SpaceX is extremely uniquely positioned to crush the rest of the world combined in order to orbital data centers

Sure, as long as your data center is 3x4m - size of a Starlink satellite (think Spinal Tap Stone Henge) . Anything bigger than that (i.e. actual data center sized) is going to require some assembly.

I've heard TeslaBot is good at folding shirts, and serving drinks (at least while teleoperated) - perhaps it can help?

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#125

I wonder if it's just Elon realising that xAI can't beat OpenAI and thus deciding to give all his compute capacity to Anthropic instead. Certainly an interesting day for xAI.

Building datacenters plays to his strengths. It's a good partnership if he can stomach it.

As long as it keeps Altman awake at night, it's all good I believe for Elon.

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#126
post #49

Doubling the five-hour rate limits is merely a marketing stunt if the weekly rates are not also doubled. It simply means that you can reach the weekly limits in three days instead of five.

Exactly, the weekly limits are the real limiting factor. If you really push it, you can easily hit the weekly $200/mo Max limit in a day.

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#127
post #2

>Higher usage limits >The following three changes—all effective today—are aimed at improving the experience of using Claude for our most dedicated customers. >First, we’re doubling Claude Code’s five-hour rate limits for Pro, Max, Team, and seat-based Enterprise plans. >Second, we’re removing the peak hours limit reduction on Claude Code for Pro and Max accounts. >Third, we’re raising our API rate limits considerably…

I don't know if it relates to the same data centers, but this also comes hours after several still recent Grok models were deprecated at short notice. Grok 4.1 Fast is the cheapest way to do research on X (cheaper than the X API!) and it's gone on May 15: https://docs.x.ai/developers/models - freeing up compute to sell?

Unlikely, because xAI had huge amount of overcapacity.

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#128
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The details are secret. It very well could be wasted GPU time but Anthropic could have made a killer offering as well. I'm just speculating, but a particularly killer offering Elon wouldnt be able to refuse would be if Anthropic agreed to give them some training data / technology.

Billions in revenue just before your IPO isn't a bad deal either.

The icing on the cake for Elon is that it strengthens the competition to OpenAI.

Or is that actually his main motivation. Hard to know. Either way it's a win win win for him.

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#129

Colossus 1 datacenter is the one using illegal power, is poisoning the air for poor communities near Memphis, and is potentially poisoning the water. It's likely the additional demand on the grid will cause massive blackouts during extreme weather events, putting residents at further risk. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus_(supercomputer)#Envir... So you can put Anthropic on your list of companies that like to t…

Illegal is a strong term here. While the wiki link you included indicates there might be some permitting nuances, I've seen nothing claiming the power is "illegal."

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#130
post #14

Anthropic renting out the data center Elon built for Grok is the kind of plot twist you can't make up.

Plot twist but makes perfect sense for both companies. Anthropic gets the compute they so desperately need to keep growing. Elon rents out compute that xAI couldn't make use of due to little demand for Grok. SpaceX gets revenue on the books for IPO. PS. I want to translate this part: We’re very intentional about where we’ll add capacity—partnering with democratic countries whose legal and regulatory frameworks suppor…

>we'll even buy compute from China if we can sell Anthropic models there.

Considering that Anthropic mass-bans Chinese users accounts based on using VPN (used to circumvent the Chinese firewall) and then demands an ID or a residence permit of a country where Claude officially works to ensure that the user doesn't live in China, seems unlikely.

Post reply on HN