Anthropic renting out the data center Elon built for Grok is the kind of plot twist you can't make up.
Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
111–120 of 519 posts
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#112> First, we’re doubling Claude Code’s five-hour rate limits for Pro, Max, Team, and seat-based Enterprise plans. The fine-print-omission appears to be that weekly limits are not doubled. The progressive 5-hour rate limit shrinking was indeed an efficiency blocker that finally convinced me to cancel, but being only able to get 4 full sessions a week as opposed to 8 doesn't compell me to resubscribe.
At this point if feels like if you properly scope your work open weight LLMs are adequate.
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is very much a valid argument. SpaceX has been working on this issue for years. https://theconversation.com/a-million-new-spacex-satellites-... FTA: "SpaceX has done a lot of engineering work to make its Starlink satellites fainter. They are still too bright for research astronomy, but thanks to new coatings, their brightness has not increased dramatically even as SpaceX has launched larger and larger satellites."
I acknowledge there's an issue here, but I don't think it makes sense to label it "pollution". When something is polluted it generally means using it can lead to some form of harm, directly or indirectly. I fail to see how confusing satellites for stars stars causes harm, per se (though of course it would suck to be an astronomer).
Also who said pollution has to be harmful? Light pollution is a thing, and this is the same class of problem.
Why dont they dip the satellites in vantablack to make them truly invisible?
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#114Doubling the five-hour rate limits is merely a marketing stunt if the weekly rates are not also doubled. It simply means that you can reach the weekly limits in three days instead of five.
I have never come close to my weekly limit, but have hit my hourly limit frequently.
I also hope that the fact I had OpenClaw in my sandbox once is not why I hit these limits so damn fast. I don't use it anymore and I've tried to rid my sandbox of anything "openclaw" but it is in my git history in various places on various projects. Claude doesn't seem to be transparent about this limitation.
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#115Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#116Anthropic renting out the data center Elon built for Grok is the kind of plot twist you can't make up.
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#117Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#118My first impression to this post is "what the hell are they thinking?", but actually it seems like a decent move by them.
They basically made it so that normal users can better utilize their plan while not benefitting the backgroundagentmaxxers and stealth openclaw abusers in the ranks of their subscription audience. Making their plan more attractive to the people they actually want to sell to.
Hopefully this leads to a loosening of harness restrictions later.
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#119xAI has added about 500MW of nvidia gpu capacity in ~April
and will add another 500MW before the end of the year totaling about 2GW.
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#120Anthropic renting out the data center Elon built for Grok is the kind of plot twist you can't make up.
Plot twist but makes perfect sense for both companies. Anthropic gets the compute they so desperately need to keep growing. Elon rents out compute that xAI couldn't make use of due to little demand for Grok. SpaceX gets revenue on the books for IPO. PS. I want to translate this part: We’re very intentional about where we’ll add capacity—partnering with democratic countries whose legal and regulatory frameworks suppor…