Live data from Hacker News

Google removes "Doki Doki Literature Club" from Google Play

bsky.app

91–100 of 309 posts

Re: Google removes "Doki Doki Literature Club" from Google Play

#91
post #31
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hey, on the other hand, zero malware! It is zero, right? Please say it's zero... Just today I found a malicious version of Ledger on the macOS app store. It's been there for five weeks , and there are already some anecdotes out there of people losing their coins. I guess that's somehow the developer's fault for not "staking their claim" to their name, as Apple seems to only monitor for malicious duplicate submissions…

Sure, and zero ads and total privacy, as well

Ads would never be used for malware either, thankfully.

Re: Google removes "Doki Doki Literature Club" from Google Play

#93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Brazil and India have created alternatives to Mastercard/Visa duopoly. EU is seeking to do the same.

Bitcoin exists. Completely permissionless, anyone on earth can use it. Easier to accept as a merchant than any third party integration. Doesn't require you to trust any government at all.

People are downvoting you, but I can literally pay for my meal using CashApp at a diner in the middle of nowhere using Bitcoin.

Re: Google removes "Doki Doki Literature Club" from Google Play

#94
post #59

This is why a monopoly is bad. Google can dictate who has access or retains access.

Google can dictate who has or retains access to their market, but that doesn't make them a monopoly, since other markets exist. This game is still available on Steam and probably elsewhere.

For android?

Re: Google removes "Doki Doki Literature Club" from Google Play

#95
post #90
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We do not need our hyperscaler minders telling us what content we can and cannot consume. This ought to be grounds to litigate antitrust. This should not be happening. We need web-based app installs without scare walls ("downloading from the internet is dangerous"), without hidden settings menus to enable them ("Settings > Apps > Special app access > Install unknown apps"), and without any interference or meddling fr…

This should already be illegal under the DMA. I don't know how Google is planning to get out of it.

There hasn't been so much as a finger lifted against antitrust behavior since 2000. They feel as though they're invincible at this point.

Re: Google removes "Doki Doki Literature Club" from Google Play

#97
post #95
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This should already be illegal under the DMA. I don't know how Google is planning to get out of it.

There hasn't been so much as a finger lifted against antitrust behavior since 2000. They feel as though they're invincible at this point.

Apple got a lot of flak for their shenanigans, but here's hoping the EU puts the hammer down on both of them.

Re: Google removes "Doki Doki Literature Club" from Google Play

#98
Doki Doki Literature Club is a game that I played, and then replayed, purely on the basis of recommendations by trusted reviewers. The genre (visual novel) and theme (anime pin-up schoolgirl) are ones that I have no interest in. I was extremely glad that I did play it, though; it was a profoundly thought-provoking experience. It was extremely disturbing in the best possible way.

Definitely not for kids, though, and it's worth taking the content/trigger warnings seriously.

Re: Google removes "Doki Doki Literature Club" from Google Play

#99
post #33
post #2

Well, at least we can "sideload" this easily with minimum attrition, right?

In a few months Google will automatically deploy new software on our devices. This will be for our benefit and to help protect us. If you still want to sideload dangerous unnaproved applications, first just ask Google for permission and then a day later they'll let you sideload applications to your device. I'm so grateful that they are allowing us to do this and protecting us.

[dead]

Re: Google removes "Doki Doki Literature Club" from Google Play

#100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Violent"? Do you consider news reporting to be violent too? This isn't remotely in the league of all the shooter games you can find on the store.

Gore in shooters is culturally treated as much less "violent" than e.g. graphic scenes of suicide. You could make an argument that it shouldn't be, but it is.

Most shooters are an abstraction, i.e. you're not really shooting anyone.

You are, but you're not.

Most of them are in the same league of violence that an aggressive debate would be in.

Post reply on HN