Earlier quoted context omitted.
I doubt many are Catholic. J.D. Vance would be an option, tho.
Biden was Catholic, yet not even him sponsoring a genocide was enough to warrant an excommunication.
The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV's Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy
51–60 of 332 posts
Re: The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV's Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy
#52Anyone have non paywalled reporting? Technically I think this post is HN guideline-breaking as there is no easy bypass for substack paywalls.
Re: The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV's Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy
#53[flagged]
You may be joking, but Hegseth unironically believes this. A fact that should scare everyone.
Pete Hegseth's beliefs aren't even unusual for much of the country, he just isn't canny enough to play the game his predecessors did and not say the quiet part out loud.
Re: The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV's Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
I doubt many are Catholic. J.D. Vance would be an option, tho.
Wait until you find out how many Latino people serve in the military.
Re: The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV's Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy
#55A Straussian comment. Not unexpected sadly.
Re: The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV's Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
well, ~21% of americans are catholic
"are Catholic" is so fuzzy though. "identify as" and "practices" are wildly different experiences, at least on the receiving end. I'm sure that percentage is mostly consisting of "identify as" rather than "practicing".
At this point I don't think anything other than the church retains the ability to present a coherent moral or metaphysical intellectual framework to people who care about that kind of thing.
I would be very surprised if the united states is not majority catholic in ~100 years
Re: The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV's Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy
#57Idk which is more impressive that someone referenced the Avignon Papacy in a heat of the moment argument or that the same person who could reference that thought it was a good idea. (Not Catholic...but like...why?)
It is literally this tweet from a few years ago: > Every lifelong Catholic I've ever met is like "I think we're supposed to give this food to poor people" and every adult convert is like "the Archon of Constantinople's epistle on the Pentacostine rites of the eucharist clearly states women shouldn't have driver's licenses."
Re: The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV's Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy
#58Re: The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV's Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy
#59Lot of Catholics are MAGA aren't they? The few I talked to recently were really anti-woke, like 'woke' is ruining the world. Very Maga. How does this land with them?
I guess it's obvious from the outside, maybe not so much from the inside, but it's clear they're massaging the MAGA masses to establish the new pope as someone who isn't a real pope, so probably won't matter much, since this approach is already underway.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdrg8zkz8d0o
Trump is the real pope obviously.
Re: The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV's Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy
#60> Under Secretary of War for Policy Elbridge Colby summoned the Holy See’s then-ambassador to the U.S., Cardinal Christophe Pierre, to the Pentagon. Can the DOD do this? This seems more like the purview of State.
Any exec branch dept can communicate directly with foreign diplomats, and ambassadors are accredited to the USA as a whole, not exclusively to State