Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only

microsoft.com

121–130 of 227 posts

Re: Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only

#121
post #71

FYI: This is only for the "Cortana replacement" Copilot, not the other Copilots. This language doesn't appear in GitHub Copilot's Consumer Agreement, for example.

Maybe they shouldn't name everything Copilot.

Copilot copilot Copilot copilot copilot copilot Copilot copilot.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffal...

Re: Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only

#123
post #71

FYI: This is only for the "Cortana replacement" Copilot, not the other Copilots. This language doesn't appear in GitHub Copilot's Consumer Agreement, for example.

Maybe they shouldn't name everything Copilot.

In the past, Microsoft named everything ".NET" [1] or "Windows Live" [2]. And before naming everything "Copilot", Microsoft named everything "Microsoft 365" [3].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_.NET_strategy

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Live

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_365

Re: Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only

#124
post #62

Anthropic does a somewhat similar thing. If you visit their ToS (the one for Max/Pro plans) from a European IP address, they replace one section with this: Non-commercial use only. You agree not to use our Services for any commercial or business purposes and we (and our Providers) have no liability to you for any loss of profit, loss of business, business interruption, or loss of business opportunity. It's funny that…

Well, there's your rationale as to why AI cannot replace you. When sh!t hits the fan, Anthropic will immediately point to this clause. Who knows, maybe a court would see it as valid. Meanwhile, your customer (and thus, your management) is looking for someone to blame for excrement making contact with the impellers. And that someone's gonna be you.

Employees often make mistakes that cost companies thousands of dollars. And there's no shortage of stories where employees cost companies tens of thousands and millions.

When a construction guy messes up measurements and thousands of dollars of work has the be removed and redone, no one thinks of taking the employee to court. Why would you want to take your Ai to court?

Re: Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only

#126
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Like when i went to my github account to withdraw all copilot consents - which i never used anyway just to be greeted with an email that welcomed me to copilot and the free plan. No button or link to disable the thing.

> No button or link to disable the thing. The line i initially quoted: > You may stop using Copilot at any time. Was incomplete. It continues with what initially appears to be a non sequitur: > You may stop using Copilot at any time. If you want to close your Microsoft Account, please see the Microsoft Services Agreement. It may not be a non sequitur, but may well be the only way to "opt out" of Copilot.

I don't even have a microsoft account! anything microsoft i had (like the ancient hotmail address) was deleted years ago

Re: Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only

#127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My two cents is that if it didn't, 'I didn't know that was illegal/breach of contract' would be a valid legal defense. Although intentionally saying things that contradict whats in the contract might be legally objectionable.

I wish we lived in more of a "spirit of the law" world than a "letter of the law" world, where everything needs to be spelled out, but we don't. A small minority of people enjoy Rules Lawyering their way through life, insisting on trying to "gotcha" counterparties who are acting in good faith, so as a consequence, we all have to be Rules Lawyers and everything needs to be spelled out.

I think a “spirit of the law” world would result in judges that already abuse their absurd powers way too much have free rein over any abuse they want to do, and there would be no system for ensuring everyone is treated equally or fairly.

Re: Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only

#128
post #53
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Copilot is for entertainment purposes only. It can make mistakes, and it may not work as intended. Don’t rely on Copilot for important advice. Use Copilot at your own risk. Seems pretty clear to me, do you really think people need a lawyer to understand that?

The only thing "clear" about that License agreement is it contradicts all their other marketing about Copilot. So either that document is fraudulent or everyone else at Microsoft is committing fraud daily. Examples from the first search result: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/microsoft-365-copi... Support page with ~25 tutorials provided by Microsoft about how to "Create a document with Copilot" or "Create…

Did Microsoft force you to follow the tutorials and use CoPilot for business?

Re: Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only

#129
These terms too are pretty entertaning.

we can’t promise that any Copilot’s Responses won’t infringe someone else’s rights (like their copyrights, trademarks, or rights of privacy) or defame them.

You agree to indemnify us and hold us harmless (including our affiliates, employees and any other agents) from and against any claims, losses, and expenses (including attorneys' fees) arising from or relating to your use of Copilot

Re: Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only

#130
post #15

The section titled > IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES & WARNINGS Tells us: > You may stop using Copilot at any time. That's an odd thing to include in a ToS.

I am working really hard to not start using Copilot. And belive me, if you use any Microsoft products or services they really make it hard to avoid accidentally using the damn thing. Including adding it to your office plan and then charging you 2x.

I’ve only used it once, for WorkFlow creation but it seemed really useful there, but that may be more of an indictment of WorkFlow than an endorsement of CoPilot.
Post reply on HN