Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only
21–30 of 227 posts
Re: Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only
#22The section titled > IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES & WARNINGS Tells us: > You may stop using Copilot at any time. That's an odd thing to include in a ToS.
And belive me, if you use any Microsoft products or services they really make it hard to avoid accidentally using the damn thing.
Including adding it to your office plan and then charging you 2x.
Re: Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only
#23The section titled > IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES & WARNINGS Tells us: > You may stop using Copilot at any time. That's an odd thing to include in a ToS.
I am working really hard to not start using Copilot. And belive me, if you use any Microsoft products or services they really make it hard to avoid accidentally using the damn thing. Including adding it to your office plan and then charging you 2x.
Re: Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only
#24Re: Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only
#25> Copilot is for entertainment purposes only. It can make mistakes, and it may not work as intended. Don’t rely on Copilot for important advice. Use Copilot at your own risk. > We don’t own Your Content, but we may use Your Content to operate Copilot and improve it. By using Copilot, you grant us permission to use Your Content, which means we can copy, distribute, transmit, publicly display, publicly perform, edit, t…
Re: Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only
#26Re: Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only
#27The section titled > IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES & WARNINGS Tells us: > You may stop using Copilot at any time. That's an odd thing to include in a ToS.
Re: Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only
#28The section titled > IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES & WARNINGS Tells us: > You may stop using Copilot at any time. That's an odd thing to include in a ToS.
Re: Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
My two cents is that if it didn't, 'I didn't know that was illegal/breach of contract' would be a valid legal defense. Although intentionally saying things that contradict whats in the contract might be legally objectionable.
When the contract is purposefully obtuse and hard to understand, that should be a valid legal defense. When it's huge, falls upon people that can't justify a lawyer, and keeps changing all the time, one shouldn't even need to claim it. It should be automatically invalid.
Seems pretty clear to me, do you really think people need a lawyer to understand that?
Re: Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only
#30The section titled > IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES & WARNINGS Tells us: > You may stop using Copilot at any time. That's an odd thing to include in a ToS.
I doubt it is odd, I suspect almost every ToS has something similar.