Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks, I also saw this as PyPI and was confused, lol
now somebody just needs to make a PiPy for the raspberry pi
Warn about PyPy being unmaintained
21–30 of 181 posts
Re: Warn about PyPy being unmaintained
#22Odd how you still see announcements of this nature if Anthropic's marketing is be believed.
Re: Warn about PyPy being unmaintained
#23Re: Warn about PyPy being unmaintained
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
What euphemism do you prefer then...
There's a difference between dead (i.e. "unmaintained") and low activity ("not under active development"). From what I can see PyPy is in the latter category (and being in that category does not mean it's going to die soon), so choosing to claim it is unmaintained is notable.
Re: Warn about PyPy being unmaintained
#25Odd how you still see announcements of this nature if Anthropic's marketing is be believed.
Re: Warn about PyPy being unmaintained
#26On the other hand, I always got the impression that the main goal of PyPy is to be a research project (on meta-tracing, STM etc) rather than a replacement for CPython in production.
Maybe that, plus the core Python team’s indifference towards non-CPython implementations, is why it doesn’t get the recognition it deserves.
Re: Warn about PyPy being unmaintained
#27Re: Warn about PyPy being unmaintained
#28Somewhat interesting that "volunteer project no longer under active development" got changed to "unmaintained".
Re: Warn about PyPy being unmaintained
#29Edit: I understand the underlying issue and the PyPy developer's opinion. I don't disagree on that part; I only refer to the name similarity as a problem.
Re: Warn about PyPy being unmaintained
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's a difference between dead (i.e. "unmaintained") and low activity ("not under active development"). From what I can see PyPy is in the latter category (and being in that category does not mean it's going to die soon), so choosing to claim it is unmaintained is notable.
Being three major versions behind CPython is definitely not a great sign for the long-term viability of it.