Why does everyone associated with this administration sound like a 17 year old who got dumped when they post on twitter.
Basically a reflection of the average intelligence in the U.S.
(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
991–1000 of 1001 posts
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#992Earlier quoted context omitted.
There were two red lines, as I understand it -- first, automated kill bots, and second, mass surveillance.
I guess the problem for Trump is if he orders the army to gun down protesters, there’s a good chance they will refuse to do it. While a bot can just be prompted to go ahead.
What do you think ICE is for?
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#993Ukrainians and Russians are experimenting with FPV drones using AI for target acquisition and homing. Not yet economically viable because it is cheaper to give your FPV fiber spool instead of Nvidia Jetson to bypass jamming. When we have first politician blown to bits by autonomous AI FPV there will be sheer panic of every politician in the world to put the genie back into the bottle. It will be too late at that poin…
If one of our main adversaries is building these weapons already, this is actually an argument for developing this technology ourselves.
How is it possible to still not understand that our main adversaries are in our own government?
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#994Strange times. I truly feel these are the last days of our Republic. Especially if more aren't willing to take a stand.
As a Canadian looking in, I see people talking about a 36% approval as low. How is it that high!? That means that more than 1-in-3 of your countrymen are ride-or-die, and it's just heartbreaking to see that we're going to have to launch that many people into the sun.
Your comment is actually a great example of why his approval rating is as high as it is. It's because those who still support him know what you think of them. They know that you think of them as less than human, and they are willing to do anything, even support a complete monster like Trump (and he is a murdering, sociopathic monster), to fight against you. And one promise he is keeping, along all the many he's broken, is that he is fighting the left.
Don't think that people like you, who so casually dehumanize those who disagree, have no responsibility in him getting elected.
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#995American people: latinamerican here. Maybe it's silly to root for a country in the world hegemony arena. I've usually been partial to the USA over China. Now I'm not rooting for your country anymore. As far as I'm concerned, I'd rather have China being the foremost power, at least they seem to be less keen on invading or heavily strong-arming latinamerica
They are literally doing what China has already done. In what world would China be a better option here?
In this world, the one where China isn't invading its neighbors and overthrowing governments all around the world.
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#996Earlier quoted context omitted.
As a Canadian looking in, I see people talking about a 36% approval as low. How is it that high!? That means that more than 1-in-3 of your countrymen are ride-or-die, and it's just heartbreaking to see that we're going to have to launch that many people into the sun.
Your comment is actually a great example of why his approval rating is as high as it is. It's because those who still support him know what you think of them. They know that you think of them as less than human, and they are willing to do anything, even support a complete monster like Trump (and he is a murdering, sociopathic monster), to fight against you. And one promise he is keeping, along all the many he's broke…
I'll take your point in good faith, but the fact remains that you have about 100M people in a fascist cult that need to be deprogrammed.
I don't claim to know how to fix this, but I also have no bandwidth for false equivalency with people who routinely deny things we can see with our eyes.
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#997Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can't just unplug the thing and use something else. Obviously the DoD would not want limited use. Strange they don't make their own given their specific needs.
I think this is maybe the most revealing thing about this saga, that seemingly the U.S. government has not been training their own frontier models.
Or, Hegseth revved up an internal govt model and found it just as woke as Anthropic.
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#998Good. I'd rather not have my favorite AI from a company working on AGI to have murder and spying in it's DNA. In fact, as a patriotic American veteran, I'd be ok with Anthropic moving to Europe. It might be better for Claude and AGI, which are overriding issues for me. Rutger Bregman @rcbregman This is a huge opportunity for Europe. Welcome Anthropic with open arms. Roll out the red carpet. Visa for all employees. Eu…
Why wouldn’t the government just arrest their board and execs on charges of treason or something? At this point they could probably publicly hang them all and a plurality of Americans would cheer it. I don’t know if you appreciate how disliked tech is by the left and right alike.
I don't get the downvotes or replies. The answer has nothing to do with ethics. AI is the only thing propping up Trump's stock market.
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#999Earlier quoted context omitted.
Being a hacker used to be an extremely political and ideological movement. Then capitalism came along and bought the term. It's about time we take that word back where it belongs.
Tell me, oh sage, how it was possible to become a hacker before "capitalism" created the computers needed to do so? And no, hacking was not "an extremely political and ideological movement", it was (and is) the a[c,r]t of going down as deep the rabbit hole of whatever the was to be hacked as time and the hole allowed to see what lurks there. The term was eventually co-opted by the media - not "capitalism" - to identi…
lol, Wozniak and Jobs' first product was a blue box. I guess you had to be there.
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#1000Wow, and the only restrictions Anthropic asked for are (1) no mass domestic surveillance and (2) require human-in-the-loop for killing [1]. Those seem exceptionally reasonable, and even rather weak, lol :| [1] https://www.anthropic.com/news/statement-department-of-war
Did the DoW ask for these things? This whole thing seems like people talking past each other, and that there’s something being left unsaid. Anthropic doesn’t make a product that would assist with kill drones, and they don’t have the right to deny subpoenas.
The announcement hasn't worked through official legal channels, but Anthropic is taking it seriously. The official channel will be a written explanation to Congress, and could be classified.
Hegseth objected to guardrails being "woke". Something about "curly haired" almost-men telling him how he can use his "war fighters".
I speculate that Trump and Hegseth were both late to the realization that AI could unwind, for example, the next Panama Papers, and are doing this to try to demonstrate power to the industry. Musk tried to explain all this, but they actually encountered him as "autistic". This all looks like a disjointed conversation because we can see slightly more of the future than them.