Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think Julia has largely not solved it because it is clunky to use for purposes other than scientific computing. Python can't be argued to be that, it's very nice for web development as well as scientific computing, the issue is just that for non-scientific computing use cases the perf. isn't great.
If you think Python is nice for scientific computing, you must have never tried Matlab. Python is pretty clunky in comparison in its syntax for scientific computing.
Python 3.14 is here. How fast is it?
551–560 of 579 posts
Re: Python 3.14 is here. How fast is it?
#552Earlier quoted context omitted.
LOL, python is plenty fast if you make sure it calls C or Rust behind the scenes. Typical of 'professional' python people. Something too slow? just drop into C. It surely sounds weird to everyone who complains about Python being slow and the response is on these lines.
And then someone needs to cross FFI border multiple times and gained perf is hurting again.
Re: Python 3.14 is here. How fast is it?
#553Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree. Unless they make it like 10x faster it doesn't really change anything. It's still a language you only use if you absolutely don't care whatsoever about performance and can guarantee that you never will .
The counterargument used to be, the heavy lifting will be offloaded to python modules written in C, like numpy. Which was true, but maybe not the strongest argument. Why not use a faster language in the first place? But it's different now. There's huge classes of problems where pytorch, jax &co. are the only options that don't suck. Good luck competing with python code that uses them on performance.
Because most faster languages sucks donkeys balls when it comes to using them quickly and without ceremony. Never mind trying to teach non-programmers (e.g. physics, statistics, etc people) them...
Re: Python 3.14 is here. How fast is it?
#554Earlier quoted context omitted.
Says you! I don’t even know if you’re a bot. You’re probably a bot because you say things I don’t agree with! Wait! Maybe I AM THE ‘bot? What were we talking about again?
If you see very similar comments being made by many different accounts over a small timeframe you are likely seeing bots.
If you think that doesn't happen organically, take another look at the site you're on.
Re: Python 3.14 is here. How fast is it?
#555Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, there are Russians on the Internet. No, they’re not all trolls. No, I’m not Russian. Yes, there are American trolls on the Internet. No, America doesn’t own the Internet.
I have no idea what you are trying to say. Russia pays hundreds of people to post comments on the Internet. They have been doing this since the Jade Helm Conspiracy hysteria they caused proved their methods to be very effective. https://www.texastribune.org/2018/05/03/hysteria-over-jade-h... Hysteria over Jade Helm exercise in Texas was fueled by Russians, former CIA director says Gov. Greg Abbott's decision in 2015…
Anyone in a position of authoritarian power can say anything. Until it's prosecuted in an open court of law, all bets are off. Hysteria is easily promoted by anyone in the world - even American companies are capable of it - and there is much profit to be made from Russophobia, especially in the heinous market conditions of America's military industrial complex: a very well known hysteria-promoting industry.
In fact, by spreading this rumour, you are more soviet than you might understand.
Re: Python 3.14 is here. How fast is it?
#556Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you see very similar comments being made by many different accounts over a small timeframe you are likely seeing bots.
That, or it's just collective reality taking its toll. Doesn't have to be an organised campaign of bots - can also just be fans of the idea across a diverse set of humanity. If you think that doesn't happen organically, take another look at the site you're on.
Re: Python 3.14 is here. How fast is it?
#557Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have no idea what you are trying to say. Russia pays hundreds of people to post comments on the Internet. They have been doing this since the Jade Helm Conspiracy hysteria they caused proved their methods to be very effective. https://www.texastribune.org/2018/05/03/hysteria-over-jade-h... Hysteria over Jade Helm exercise in Texas was fueled by Russians, former CIA director says Gov. Greg Abbott's decision in 2015…
The former CIA director is not, at all, someone who can be trusted. They don't present their evidence, either. Anyone in a position of authoritarian power can say anything . Until it's prosecuted in an open court of law, all bets are off. Hysteria is easily promoted by anyone in the world - even American companies are capable of it - and there is much profit to be made from Russophobia, especially in the heinous mark…
Re: Python 3.14 is here. How fast is it?
#558Earlier quoted context omitted.
I hope they go Full Cracker Barrel on this: 1. Original logo has country charm and soul. 2. Replaced with a modern soulless logo. 3. Customer outrage! 4. Company (or open source project) comes to its senses and returns to old logo. https://media.nbcboston.com/2025/08/cracker-barrel-split.jpg (n.b. The Cracker Barrel Rebellion is sometimes associated with MAGA. I am very far from that, but I have to respect when peopl…
the funny thing about the Cracker Barrel brouhaha is that the new one still looked like something you'd find on a pack of matches from a hotel bar in the 70s.
Re: Python 3.14 is here. How fast is it?
#559Earlier quoted context omitted.
Russia has gotten VERY good at amplifying any cultural differences or controversies in order to break US politics (and many other countries). If you hadn't noticed it has been VERY effective.
If you haven't noticed, there is no evidence of your claims.
It would be quite naive to think they don't do the same in the virtual world of the internet, where it is even cheaper…
Re: Python 3.14 is here. How fast is it?
#560Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm annoyed every time I have to write $(which time). But the stats given by -v are just so much more valuable from gnu-time.
Wouldn't it also work with "env time" if that's easier to type?