Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
You should be emailing the staff with that request, not complaining in a thread. You should also include your evidence.
U.S. investors, Trump close in on TikTok deal with China
391–400 of 802 posts
Re: U.S. investors, Trump close in on TikTok deal with China
#392Key details: 1. New, US-specific TikTok App, separate from the main TikTok app in content and users. 2. 80% owned by a U.S. investor consortium led by Oracle, Silver Lake, and Andreessen Horowitz, 20% by Bytedance. 3. Board will include one U.S. government–appointed director. 4. All U.S. user data would sit on Oracle infrastructure in the US. 5. Algorithm will be initially licensed, but has to be reengineered to comp…
That’s very interesting, I wonder if the toxicity of the American culture wars can be contained this way. Also, I see creators, trying to create US based TikTok accounts because they believe that this way their content will be shown to Americans, which are better monetized. If that’s the case, I wonder if international creator will move to the American TikTok for the better payout. It the international creators stay…
Look at recent events: American government officials want to maintain the same level of toxic culture wars that foreign governments want. They just want to control them, not contain them.
Re: U.S. investors, Trump close in on TikTok deal with China
#393Re: U.S. investors, Trump close in on TikTok deal with China
#394Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't know about tik-tok, but Instagram is totally unhinged. Boobs, butts, gambling, brain rot, watchbait/ragebait, all that stuff. YouTube shorts gets all the hate, but I find the content to consistently be the most sophisticated? PG rated? educational?
> Boobs, butts, gambling, brain rot, watchbait/ragebait, all that stuf I don't understand how other people have this experience and I don't. I see targeted ads of course. And every once in a while it starts showing me content for things I don't follow, at which point I start mashing the button they provide to make it go away, and after a handful it pops up something asking if I want to remove all suggested content fo…
Re: U.S. investors, Trump close in on TikTok deal with China
#395With, apparently, a board member appointed by the Trump administration. The U.S Steel deal included three board seats, but the Intel deal did not include any. This is starting to look like the way China does things, with the central government having a financial stake in important companies.
I'm not a fan of the administration by any means but a lot of democracies do this. Public/Private partnerships are commonplace in Europe.
Re: U.S. investors, Trump close in on TikTok deal with China
#396Is this a coup by conservative government to gain control of this social network to promote it's ideologies? first Twitter, now Tiktok, both controlled by conservative interests?
Yes. And to enrich their buddies and campaign donors like Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz.
Re: U.S. investors, Trump close in on TikTok deal with China
#397Re: U.S. investors, Trump close in on TikTok deal with China
#398Earlier quoted context omitted.
Everyone who chooses not to vote is voting “I don’t care” and so voted for whoever won.
Everyone who chooses not to vote is voting “I don’t like any candidate” and so voted against all candidates. How is your interpretation more valid than mine?
Re: U.S. investors, Trump close in on TikTok deal with China
#399Key details: 1. New, US-specific TikTok App, separate from the main TikTok app in content and users. 2. 80% owned by a U.S. investor consortium led by Oracle, Silver Lake, and Andreessen Horowitz, 20% by Bytedance. 3. Board will include one U.S. government–appointed director. 4. All U.S. user data would sit on Oracle infrastructure in the US. 5. Algorithm will be initially licensed, but has to be reengineered to comp…
In other words, one's data will now be under the scrutiny of amoral radicals who have decided to target people for political speech.
Re: U.S. investors, Trump close in on TikTok deal with China
#400Earlier quoted context omitted.
Everyone who chooses not to vote is voting “I don’t care” and so voted for whoever won.
I don't think that necessarily follows. An abstention is a voting choice that doesn't imply support for one choice or another in the minds of the voter, regardless of the result.