Earlier quoted context omitted.
> billboards covering my local highway reminding me OP is wrong. But billboards that upset you aren’t evidence of restrictions on speech.
You should give my position more thought before being dismissive. The billboards contribute to an overall campaign backed by billions of dollars to create a chilling effect. If you are unfamiliar with the chilling effect: > The "chilling effect" means that people are being discouraged or intimidated from engaging in expression for fear of negative consequences, such as social disapproval, retaliation, or lawsuits. Th…
I’m not sure how anyone listening to the American discourse around Israel and Gaza can conclude there is a chilling effect around anything in the public space. (Note: not academia.)
More specifically, this argument —one side is trying to chill the other by speaking too much—could be used to justify censorship around anything.
Speech around Gaza is absolutely being suppressed. But billboards aren’t evidence of that.