Earlier quoted context omitted.
I use privacy dot com cards I can turn off in a single click
doesn't stop it from being sent to collections. wtf are ppl downvoting this. i had it happen to me.
US Court nullifies FTC requirement for click-to-cancel
271–280 of 599 posts
Re: US Court nullifies FTC requirement for click-to-cancel
#272Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
The non-Federalist Society folks think that “emanations from penumbras” is constitutional law. How can right wing judges even compete with that? I think we may have drastically different understandings of what “the law” is.
Re: US Court nullifies FTC requirement for click-to-cancel
#273FTC is better off staying away from regulations and instead making a vague rule prohibiting companies from complicated cancellation processes if they are to be charging recurring fees. The “complicated process” would be subjective but enough to encourage companies to avoid setting up a cancellation process (bypassing the expensive burden rule) and maybe the company then chooses a simpler cancellation option.
Re: US Court nullifies FTC requirement for click-to-cancel
#274What consumer does this serve at all? What citizen does this serve at all? This only serves to allow firms to erect effort barriers to keep rent seeking fro their customers. The "gotcha" that the Khan FTC didn't "follow the rules making process" is parallel construction.
Courts don’t make decisions on whether executive rules are told or bad, serve consumers or not. The main oversight they have is ensuring compliance with procedural rules and statutory technicalities.
Re: US Court nullifies FTC requirement for click-to-cancel
#275Re: US Court nullifies FTC requirement for click-to-cancel
#276Earlier quoted context omitted.
It serves the current administration's in-group: the ultra-wealthy.
Got a surprise for you if you think any admins in group isn’t the ultra wealthy
Re: US Court nullifies FTC requirement for click-to-cancel
#277Earlier quoted context omitted.
Absolutely. I don't know if it's the FTC or FCC, but the moment I swap back to my American SIM card on trips to the US, I start getting spam texts that I cannot get rid of. Meanwhile I get absolutely zero of these with my European number.
People don't really use SMS in Europe, do they? WhatsApp spam is very pervasive, though.
Re: US Court nullifies FTC requirement for click-to-cancel
#278The consumer protection laws are so bad the other side of Atlantic. Most European countries, have their own version of consumer protection agencies, usually any kind of complaint gets sorted out, even if takes a couple months. If they fail for whatever reason, there is still the top European one. Most of the time I read about FTC, it appears to side with the wrong guys.
Re: US Court nullifies FTC requirement for click-to-cancel
#279Earlier quoted context omitted.
Any examples of American company having worse customer experience than European ones? I will give you 2 for the opposite: Amazon and Apple do no question asked refunds all the time. Much higher bar than European regulators require.
To be honest I don't think they do "no question asked refunds" for the consumer's benefit -- probably more so that they don't have to devote customer support resources to handling all the return requests they get. I'm sure you'd soon find it's not quite a guaranteed "no questions asked" process if you repeatedly return large expensive items.
Sounds like a win-win then.
This isn't zero sum. Just because it's better for the company doesn't mean it's worse for the consumer.