Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
> You know what the problem is with the world? Too many tourists. Not even in my Top 100.
Man 'refused entry into US' as border control catch him with bald JD Vance meme
571–580 of 586 posts
Re: Man 'refused entry into US' as border control catch him with bald JD Vance meme
#572Earlier quoted context omitted.
Again photos of illicit materials on your phone is not grounds for refusal of entry into a country. There is no law for that.
The law for entry to a country is not "you're allowed in so long as there is now law specifically making what you did illegal in the country"
Re: Man 'refused entry into US' as border control catch him with bald JD Vance meme
#573Earlier quoted context omitted.
The multiple examples of legal residents being detained for their Pro-palestinian activism? So the Norwegian's account can't be trusted but the CPD's can? Why? Also most drugs are not federal crimes and it sounds like he wasn't arrested for it, so there's no record and therefore no reason to prevent lawful entry.
Another example: > https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14842359/Norwegian-... > It comes after an Australian writer claimed he was turned away from the US border after being grilled on his views on the Gaza conflict and articles he wrote about pro-Palestinian protests. > Alistair Kitchen, 33, boarded a flight from Melbourne to New York to visit friends on June 12 when he was pulled to one side by a Customs and B…
Re: Man 'refused entry into US' as border control catch him with bald JD Vance meme
#574Earlier quoted context omitted.
He oversees almost nothing. The VP has no constitutional powers except to tiebreak the senate and succeed the president.
And yet coming out against this would carry significant weight.
Re: Man 'refused entry into US' as border control catch him with bald JD Vance meme
#575Wonder what the "political correctness is bad" "nobody is allowed to crack jokes anymore" "cancel culture is out of control" crowd will say about this one...
Probably either skepticism that it happened https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44369233 Or celebration https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44369218 The whole “political correctness is so bad that we need to elect the current regime” crew only ever really wanted to feel aligned with power and are more or less indifferent to what that power does so long as they are periodically made to feel reassured that they are o…
The polite description of bootlicker
Re: Man 'refused entry into US' as border control catch him with bald JD Vance meme
#576Re: Man 'refused entry into US' as border control catch him with bald JD Vance meme
#577Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because they are not American nationals. My last border crossing, a few days ago: "What was the purpose of your travel? ... What are you bringing back with you? ... Welcome home." Took one minute.
Good for you I guess but my point was lawful permanent residents shouldn't have to worry about memes on their phones.
We are so nice to non-citizens in America that many of them actually do think they are legally a citizen's equal, except for voting rights. (I used to think that myself.) They are not.
Re: Man 'refused entry into US' as border control catch him with bald JD Vance meme
#578Re: Man 'refused entry into US' as border control catch him with bald JD Vance meme
#579A teacher in school told me about the time they visited East Germany. Armed guards poked though his luggage. It's a slippery slope toward fascism.
East Germany was not a fascist state, it was an explicitly anti-fascist state. Horribly authoritarian, with wanton disregard for human rights, yes, but not "fascist".
Re: Man 'refused entry into US' as border control catch him with bald JD Vance meme
#580Earlier quoted context omitted.
Good for you I guess but my point was lawful permanent residents shouldn't have to worry about memes on their phones.
Legally they should, especially if those memes are anti-American. They are subject to immigration law, which is constitutional. We are so nice to non-citizens in America that many of them actually do think they are legally a citizen's equal, except for voting rights. (I used to think that myself.) They are not.