51–60 of 135 posts
FWIW, she was fired in 2017 and only now is trying to become a "whistleblower." If the conduct needed whistle-blowing, surely it would have been more timely to come out almost a decade ago.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Dude the US is insanely corrupt, it's just that a lot of the corruption is called "lobbying" and "consulting." Sometimes also certain forms of "legal counsel." It's whitewashed and normalized.
I’ll admit to having engaged in some of those activities if pressed.
> And she says she has the “documents” to back up her accusations. Then show those documents? It's hard to take these allegations seriously when the mysterious proof is only alluded to, not submitted as part of the testimony.
It is even harder to take the accusations seriously, given that she made factually provably wrong statements that contradict the reality (and the original article in the OP actually contrasted those very plainly and directly, gotta commend good journalism there). > Wynn-Willias told senators that Meta built a “physical pipeline connecting the United States and China” and executives “ignored warnings that this would p…
She is not claiming the pipeline exists today.
FWIW, she was fired in 2017 and only now is trying to become a "whistleblower." If the conduct needed whistle-blowing, surely it would have been more timely to come out almost a decade ago.
She published a book with these FB "revelations" recently, like a month ago, so kind of PR tour.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Many “western” governments have formed genuine ideological movements. I understand this may be difficult, but what are you actually talking about?
And the US specifically was founded on the concepts of 'rights' and 'freedoms'
I appreciate the information coming out, but in some of these situations I can't help but picture that "the worst person in the room" in regards to the offenses might also end up being the person that then becomes the most holier than thou when they get out of the company.
If you ever met someone who used to work in software ads and ask them about privacy you'll get what I mean.
I despise Facebook for many reasons, privacy being a major factor. On the other hand, both Trump and Musk own competing social media companies, and the CEOs of other social media companies have attempted to curry their favor. So, there is a potential for conflict of interest here, which could lead to a misproportion of due process. Or, regardless of truthfulness, some form of leverage. Or the trial is just for show.…
Every time I think “but the law/constitution won’t allow…” there’s some end run.
The rule of law is only as good as thems that rule the law.