Since we are now being governed by the enthusiastic ignorant raised in the wake of Reaganism (or for the unfortunate Brits, Thatcherism), it would be a really good idea for us to rename the Department of Energy to the Department of Scary Nukes We Must Keep Secure. Then maybe GOP presidents would stop nominating oilmen to be Secretary of Energy.
US government struggles to rehire nuclear safety staff it laid off days ago
531–540 of 839 posts
Re: US government struggles to rehire nuclear safety staff it laid off days ago
#532Oh well. Enjoy your extra neutrons.
Re: US government struggles to rehire nuclear safety staff it laid off days ago
#533Earlier quoted context omitted.
So you're telling me that government spending was continually going up, and while this happened our quality of life massively and suddenly improved? I feel like reversing this process is very bad.
Unless nirvana is at 100% it has to stop somewhere. What im saying is it didn't continually go up during periods of like growth, and it's not clear such high federal spending is necessary or helpful in improving the human condition.
Re: US government struggles to rehire nuclear safety staff it laid off days ago
#534Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s not arbitrary, though. He’s attacking CFPB because he wants to launch financial features on Twitter without oversight. He’s attacking USAID because they helped end apartheid in his native South Africa. It’s really all just a bunch of petty vendettas and looting.
> It’s really all just a bunch of petty vendettas and looting. Yeah. The technical term for that is "arbitrary". It isn't ideologically motivated; it is based on some dude's opinions based on who-knows-what internal dialogue. Although this financial features on Twitter sounds like a pretty good idea and I'd like to see it in the wild.
> Although this financial features on Twitter sounds like a pretty good idea and I'd like to see it in the wild.
Kind of a jaw-dropping reaction to the fact that he’s dismantling the very agency that would be in charge of regulating those features. Honestly, I really struggle to understand the mindset that’s not merely okay with but excited by this sort of egregious corruption.
Re: US government struggles to rehire nuclear safety staff it laid off days ago
#535Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did you not read my entire comment? The gov will certainly know where they live and breathe. A non-creative approach is easier. Paychecks and bonus checks are separately accounted.
How will they know if they fired the guy who's responsible for knowing?
Re: US government struggles to rehire nuclear safety staff it laid off days ago
#536Earlier quoted context omitted.
> so be careful with the point you're making I was attempting to find evidence for your claim, and I found that survey. If you can find other surveys, please share, as I am seeing this being repeated a lot.
You were finding evidence for a different goal post you shifted to, that when applied applies even more harshly to the nuclear team.
Re: US government struggles to rehire nuclear safety staff it laid off days ago
#537[dupe] Earlier: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43055119 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43063512 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43061481
It is as though the community wants to discuss this, but bad actors keep shutting down the conversation.
Re: US government struggles to rehire nuclear safety staff it laid off days ago
#538Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, Brexit took the spot previously. Not sure if US can top it, but they sure as hell trying.
Brexit pales in comparison to the damage that has _already_ been done to the US federal government. The dust just hasn’t settled yet so most of it not visible right now.
Re: US government struggles to rehire nuclear safety staff it laid off days ago
#539Earlier quoted context omitted.
Brexit pales in comparison to the damage that has _already_ been done to the US federal government. The dust just hasn’t settled yet so most of it not visible right now.
[flagged]
Re: US government struggles to rehire nuclear safety staff it laid off days ago
#540Earlier quoted context omitted.
A grudge? They've just been put into a strong negotiating position, because now both parties acknowledge that these are key employees.
I would never go back under a boss who thinks even for a second that I’m easily replaceable. It would immediately indicate to me, that I can’t trust in my boss at all. Nobody really can work effectively without trust. That’s the base of our whole society.
This is why I think current org structures, and incentives, don't map properly to SWE and fuels this employment theater of "trust me I'm not a cog" => "trust me you are".
Don't know what an ideal arrangement would be, maybe SaaS is closer. Even then, still have to convince some 'cogs' to build your SaaS corp while you recoup 90% margins off their labor which is a fast path to class consciousness and we're back at square one!