Live data from Hacker News

Asahi Linux lead developer Hector Martin resigns from Linux kernel

lkml.org

61–70 of 1001 posts

Re: Asahi Linux lead developer Hector Martin resigns from Linux kernel

#61
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Turns out FOSS devs are humas just like everybody else and suffer from the same flaws. It is rather anticlimactic. I had always imagined FOSS to be this free exchange of ideas, thoughtful consideration, and intentional action. Seeing what it has become though… Maybe closed source is better.

I hate to mention this but closed source appears to involve humans too. I was disappointed when I discovered this as well.

[dead]

Re: Asahi Linux lead developer Hector Martin resigns from Linux kernel

#62
post #48
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Arguably his reprimand of Martin is a clear signal that he will never show Rust any favor You're reading way too far into this. Linus has been publicly positive about the R4L project plenty of times.

Positive, yes, but can you point to where he says R4L is here to stay and an integral part of the kernel? He needs to commit, or drama like this will continue to boil over. He also seems content to let the C-only old guard give the R4L guys a hard time. If you only enforce the rules on one side of a conflict, it makes it pretty clear which side you agree with.

Nothing in Linux is "here to stay", it always has to demonstrate its worth, and what it's worth is depends enirely on the technology and its developers, not Linus.

Re: Asahi Linux lead developer Hector Martin resigns from Linux kernel

#63
post #43

Quoting from this thread https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/Z6OzgBYZNJPr_ZD1@phen... > Simona Vetter: (addressing Hector) ...Now I'm left with the unlikely explanation that you just like thundering in as the cavalry, fashionably late, maximally destructive, because it entertains the masses on fedi or reddit or wherever. I have no idea what you're trying to achieve here, I really don't get it, but I am for sure fe…

Sima also went way too far with some of her comments this morning:

https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/2b9b75d1-eb8e-494a-b0...

Quoting

> Being toxic on the right side of an argument is still toxic, [...]

unironically, immediately after saying @marcan

> and if that then causes you to ragequit, because you can't actually deal with the heat you've been dishing out coming back around the corner: fuck off

...is quite tonedeaf at the very least. Especially given what Marcan said about dealing with this not being his paid job.

Nobody comes off looking good here.

Re: Asahi Linux lead developer Hector Martin resigns from Linux kernel

#64
Linus replied:

    How about you accept the fact that maybe the problem is you.

    You think you know better. But the current process works.

    It has problems, but problems are a fact of life.  There is no perfect.

    However, I will say that the social media brigading just makes me not
    want to have anything at all to do with your approach.

    Because if we have issues in the kernel development model, then social
    media sure as hell isn't the solution. The same way it sure as hell
    wasn't the solution to politics.

    Technical patches and discussions matter. Social media brigading - no
    than\k you.

Re: Asahi Linux lead developer Hector Martin resigns from Linux kernel

#65
post #60

Marcan certainly can be abrasive (I mean lol, so can Linus), but all the things he points out in the message below are 100% valid - I highly recommend for anyone here to try to contribute something even very small and logical to the Linux kernel or git (which use similar processes), it’s an eye-opening experience that’s incredibly unapproachable, frustrating, and demoralizing. https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/2…

It's not Wikipedia, right? Getting the maximum number of contributors isn't a stated goal? I'm a C programmer with a fair bit of kernel experience, and they don't want me, I'm pretty sure, and I'm completely fine with that.

Wikipedia has plenty of gatekeeping too. I once had to submit a single edit three times before the moderators safeguarding the article begrudgingly accepted it.

Re: Asahi Linux lead developer Hector Martin resigns from Linux kernel

#66
post #50
post #3

Martin has worked hard on Asahi, but comes of as looking for drama and virtue signalling oftentimes. I'd give this to Linus.

[flagged]

>Starting to think it's not just a coincidence.

Is your theory that rust makes people dramatic? Or that dramatic people like rust? What other options are there, if not coincidence?

Re: Asahi Linux lead developer Hector Martin resigns from Linux kernel

#67
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Arguably his reprimand of Martin is a clear signal that he will never show Rust any favor His reprimand is a clear signal that he won't tolerate brigading. Marcan was making a pretty blatant attempt at using social pressure to influence decisions.

I'm not arguing that this is or isn't a problem but I think the statement "using social pressure to influence decisions" is so general that it could apply to just any discussion. That's kinda what discussion is. Granted there are acceptable methods within that, and not acceptable.

Martin has a habit of polarizing and aggregating discussions too much. It is not healthy at all. Linus is definitely correct, especially since he has the history of doing the same and he has tried to fix it.

Imagine if the discussion would have started with an article like this. Patch probably would be merged already:

https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/1006805/f75d238e25728afe/

Re: Asahi Linux lead developer Hector Martin resigns from Linux kernel

#68

Marcan certainly can be abrasive (I mean lol, so can Linus), but all the things he points out in the message below are 100% valid - I highly recommend for anyone here to try to contribute something even very small and logical to the Linux kernel or git (which use similar processes), it’s an eye-opening experience that’s incredibly unapproachable, frustrating, and demoralizing. https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/2…

Having contributed a few times, I'd rate it as similar (sometimes much easier!) than contributing to Firefox and Chromium. That is to say that it is indeed extremely time-consuming and frustrating, but when compared to projects of the same scale it does not necessarily come out as more time-consuming or more frustrating - this will never be a small team collaborating on a random Github repo. A simple "swap out X workflow for Y" does not fix these annoyances, and false dichotomies and peer pressure towards is not a way to cooperate.

I cannot claim to have felt the effects on the maintainer-side of this workflow in large-scale projects though.

Re: Asahi Linux lead developer Hector Martin resigns from Linux kernel

#69
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>and virtue signalling I'm not disagreeing as I don't know what exact things you're talking about, but I find "virtue signalling" and "communication" to be very similar terms these days. From statement to statement I'm not sure what anyone means by that phrase anymore.

[flagged]

I like to not assume the worst, more so on HN, but I do run into a lot of situations elsewhere on the internet where "virtue signaling" just means "someone said something I don't like".

But generally I do like to wait to understand specifically what someone means before assuming.

Re: Asahi Linux lead developer Hector Martin resigns from Linux kernel

#70
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Arguably his reprimand of Martin is a clear signal that he will never show Rust any favor His reprimand is a clear signal that he won't tolerate brigading. Marcan was making a pretty blatant attempt at using social pressure to influence decisions.

I'm not arguing that this is or isn't a problem but I think the statement "using social pressure to influence decisions" is so general that it could apply to just any discussion. That's kinda what discussion is. Granted there are acceptable methods within that, and not acceptable.

> "using social pressure to influence decisions" is so general that it could apply to just any discussion

Not really. It's one thing to discuss these things directly in the proper channels, namely the mailing list, but it's another thing entirely to make childish, passive-aggressive posts on not-Twitter about how anyone who disagrees with your actions is trying to "sabotage the project" and trying to rally your followers to cancel them on the grounds of "Code of Conduct violations" (once again proving that "Codes of Conduct" are little more than tools to enable cancel culture).

He himself acknowledged the fact that what he did was childish and embarrassing by deleting his entire Mastodon account.

Post reply on HN