Live data from Hacker News

The Microsoft 365 Copilot launch was a disaster

zdnet.com

391–400 of 591 posts

Re: The Microsoft 365 Copilot launch was a disaster

#391

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> why such a rush? OpenAI alone spent $20G plus some unknown value to make the first version of it we have now. They and all the others need to justify the investment.

Pretty impressive, only $20 grand?

$20 grand^3. Forgot the ^3.

Re: The Microsoft 365 Copilot launch was a disaster

#392

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Social media could have been utopian, too, yet those apps are algorithmic manipulation hellscapes that threaten to bring down even the most robust democracies. The same people who make it so are poised to be the ones in control of these AIs. I don't think they want the kind of utopia you imagine.

What I described doesn't have to be utopian in an absolute sense, just significantly better than where we're currently headed. I think a lot of the unchecked pessimism around super-intelligent AI is just people being a bit naive or shut off from the reality of just how terrible things are going to be over the next century. We're waging 25% tariffs over planefuls of people, what's going to happen when it's 100 million…

The problem emerges when the ones monopolizing the research use it for their own ends, which are to control everyone else.

So instead of being used to improve quality of life, AI gets used to improve efficiency of death.

Re: The Microsoft 365 Copilot launch was a disaster

#393
post #368

Earlier quoted context omitted.

essentially it would be the end of employment and return to feudalism likely followed by either a French Revolution (if lucky) or a Russian Revolution (if not)

Of what use are the peasants in an AI driven and dominated feudal society, though. Maybe us peasants be useful in wars or battles between the different lords, but this would also probably be performed by automated drones and robots. It would seem that the Lord‘s will have nothing to Lord over though. Who’s gonna buy their crap and for what reason will they they create anything? The whole thing seems like a massive do…

> It would seem that the Lord‘s will have nothing to Lord over though.

You have machines that can design and build mega-yachts, mansions, private space craft, ....

You can afford to purchase vast areas of land from people selling whatever they have to get by, ...

--

Asking what billionaires will do when they can't sell to the poor, is like asking why the human economy didn't crash ages ago because we have any off planet aliens to sell to.

Or how did we keep the economy going all this time, given the ants and trees couldn't afford anything we produce?

All an economy needs is someone with the means of production, who is able to get resources, and use those resources to produce something they want. I.e. you can have a working economy with just a single person. Or self-interested AI.

Hermits have an economy. Now imagine the hermit has trillions of dollars of resources and square miles of intelligent circuitry and robotic servants.

That hermit doesn't need the rest of us. Customers? Where we are going, we don't need customers.

Re: The Microsoft 365 Copilot launch was a disaster

#394

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> why such a rush? OpenAI alone spent $20G plus some unknown value to make the first version of it we have now. They and all the others need to justify the investment.

Pretty impressive, only $20 grand?

$20GIGA, not grand.

Re: The Microsoft 365 Copilot launch was a disaster

#395
post #345
post #342

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unusable? I still use my 27” 2011 iMac. Other than performing like a 14-year-old computer, it still does everything it ever could.

Except develop apps for the Apple platform. Or use any of the new features of the Apple macOS. Or soon receive any security updates.

Well, unless you use LegacyPatcher of course.

Re: The Microsoft 365 Copilot launch was a disaster

#396

Earlier quoted context omitted.

it's now coca cola zero sugar.

Literally everyone I know calls it "Coke Zero" - in fact, the "Zero" pattern has spread to the various soda companies to reflect the particular style of zero sugar.

Sure, that's why it was a weird rebranding.

Re: The Microsoft 365 Copilot launch was a disaster

#397
post #193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Microsoft Series X Copilot

Microsoft Series X Copilot for Business E3 with Copilot

The sad part is that that name doesn't feel like that much of a stretch for Microsoft. I wouldn't put it past them to end up with two products called Copilot.

Re: The Microsoft 365 Copilot launch was a disaster

#398
post #114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Office 2003 is my preferred pick for productivity, I use it for all new documents - and best of all there's no ribbon.

Why not LibreOffice?

Seconded. It’s sane, it’s stable, it’s compatible.

Re: The Microsoft 365 Copilot launch was a disaster

#399
post #377

Cancelled immediately after getting the email. I bought a pair of Office 2024 Professional Plus from a key reseller for £20 each for myself and my wife within the hour

Consider Microsoft Activation Script, also available for Mac Office.

This. It's no more of a license violation than getting a key from some shady reseller, but avoids having to pay or deal with said resellers.

Only ever used it for activating Windows, mind, but that works perfectly. Microsoft are clearly aware of this and don't care.

Re: The Microsoft 365 Copilot launch was a disaster

#400
post #343

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Who is writing these super long emails? Other LLMs.

Maybe in the future send an email with just a few simple words and phrases that then gets expanded by LLMs on the receiver end. A weird future awaits.

I hope it does not involve typing on a keyboard. Typing on a keyboard is so millennial, and holds back innovation, such as everybody solely using touchscreens in closed walled gardens. I hope the future is an llm that has access to all the context of our lives and then presents 4-5 such different keywords, and you just tap on the ones you want to use for the email. Once the llm is sufficiently trained, the last step can even be skipped and lead to the most seamless and obstruction-free email user experience possible.
Post reply on HN