Ah, yes. We definitely needed another bad dreams generator.
Interesting creative people will produce interesting creative output. People with no taste will produce tasteless content. The mountain of slop will grow. And some of us have no intention of publishing any output whatsoever but just find the existence of these tools fascinating and inspiring.
Sora is here
151–160 of 1001 posts
Re: Sora is here
#152I've found using these and similar tools that the amount of prompts and iteration required to create my vision (image or video in my mind) is very large and often is not able to create what I had originally wanted. A way to test this is to take a piece of footage or an image which is the ground truth, and test how much prompting and editing it takes to get the same or similar ground truth starting from scratch. It is…
Re: Sora is here
#153I've found using these and similar tools that the amount of prompts and iteration required to create my vision (image or video in my mind) is very large and often is not able to create what I had originally wanted. A way to test this is to take a piece of footage or an image which is the ground truth, and test how much prompting and editing it takes to get the same or similar ground truth starting from scratch. It is…
Re: Sora is here
#154He flower one is the best looking.
Re: Sora is here
#155OpenAI is a masterclass in pissing off paying customers. I'm just about ready to cancel my ChatGPT subscription and move fully over to Claude because OpenAI has spit in my face one too many times. I'm tired of announcements of things being available only to find out "No, they aren't" or "It's rolling out slowly" where "slowly" can mean days, weeks, or month (no exaggeration). I'm tired of shit like this: Sign ups are…
I really don't think it's reasonable to expect them to onboard what is likely tens of thousands of sign ups in the first hour.
Re: Sora is here
#156Wow this is bad. And by bad i mean worse than leading open source and existing alternatives. Is it me or does it seem like OpenAI revolutionized with both chatGPT and Sora, but they've completely hit the ceiling? Honestly a bit surprised it happened so fast!
What are the leading alternatives? (Open source or otherwise)
You can see more model samples heee https://youtu.be/bCAV_9O1ioc
Re: Sora is here
#157Earlier quoted context omitted.
Real artists struggle matching vague descriptions of what is in your head too. This is at least quicker?
The point is if you are the artist and have something in your head. It’s the same problem with image editing. I am sure you have experienced this.
AI or not, no one but you cares about the lower order bits of your idea.
Re: Sora is here
#158Earlier quoted context omitted.
For me even if I know what I want, if I’m using gen AI I’m happy to compromise and get good enough (which again, is so much better than I could do otherwise). If you want higher quality/precision, you’ll likely want to ask a professional, and I don’t expect that to change in the near future.
That limits its value for industries like Hollywood, though, doesn't it? And without that, who exactly is going to pay for this?
Re: Sora is here
#159I've found using these and similar tools that the amount of prompts and iteration required to create my vision (image or video in my mind) is very large and often is not able to create what I had originally wanted. A way to test this is to take a piece of footage or an image which is the ground truth, and test how much prompting and editing it takes to get the same or similar ground truth starting from scratch. It is…
It just plain isn't possible if you mean a prompt the size of what most people have been using lately, in the couple hundred character range. By sheer information theory, the number of possible interpretations of "a zoom in on a happy dog catching a frisbee" means that you can not match a particular clip out of the set with just that much text. You will need vastly more content; information about the breed, informati…
Re: Sora is here
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
For me even if I know what I want, if I’m using gen AI I’m happy to compromise and get good enough (which again, is so much better than I could do otherwise). If you want higher quality/precision, you’ll likely want to ask a professional, and I don’t expect that to change in the near future.
That limits its value for industries like Hollywood, though, doesn't it? And without that, who exactly is going to pay for this?
People pay for stock images.