Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why would he not post about his own banishment over such BS? When people feign offense to get their colleagues banned over such innocent words as "question" in the title of a paper, why should anyone bend over and accept such authoritarian influence? Someone has to push back on the tyranny of the crybully. >It honestly makes me sad to watch a guy who went to Stanford and worked at Apple and Google get involved with d…
Most people haven't had any genuine exposure to the cultures that exist on the extreme ends of the political spectrum. You would have to be familiar with them to understand what emotions that dredges up, otherwise you're going to be terribly confused by this. However understanding is not a requisite for diplomatic communication with other cultures. An international standards committee that wants to represent the inte…
C++ Standards Contributor Expelled for 'The Undefined Behavior Question'
91–100 of 122 posts
Re: C++ Standards Contributor Expelled for 'The Undefined Behavior Question'
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
>An international standards committee that wants to represent the interests of all groups needs to take this kind of thing seriously. Perhaps, but perhaps there are times where the "extreme ends of the political spectrum" are actually muckrakers who use feigned offense as a tool for eliminating people they just don't like for petty reasons. People can be offended for any number of reasons but somehow certain arbitrar…
She's very much an agitator. However the C++ leaders aren't trying to avoid offending anyone. They're trying to do something even more difficult which is not making anyone feel uncomfortable. That paper's title makes people think about things they'd rather not think about instead of C++. Normal people would just read it, feel distracted, and then say nothing, which is unfortunate, since I'm sure Andrew would have muc…
Re: C++ Standards Contributor Expelled for 'The Undefined Behavior Question'
#93This appears to be the source of the backlash: https://izzys.casa/2024/11/on-safe-cxx/
To save anyone else the time: > Andrew Tomazos submitted P3403, a paper titled “The Undefined Behavior Question” (which HOOBOY man we’re just knocking it out of the fucking park with possible anti-semitic dog whistles today aren’t we?) Riiiight. To be fair apart from that their criticism of Tomasoz seems relatively justifiable, if unnecessarily angry. Tomasoz has said that "almost noone" has ever written anything pro…
Re: C++ Standards Contributor Expelled for 'The Undefined Behavior Question'
#94Sigh. About 20 years ago, I suggested in comp.language.c++ on USENET that the committee's refusal to take memory safety seriously constituted material support of terrorism. That really got some people upset, and the posting was removed from USENET, which is hard to do. Now, of course, C++ is frantically trying to become memory-safe, with heavy pressure from the cybersecurity parts of the US government. Has anybody ev…
Re: C++ Standards Contributor Expelled for 'The Undefined Behavior Question'
#95While the title could indeed be a reference to the 4chan "The xxx question" meme (e.g., "The femboy question"), which is derived from "The Jewish question," it's not clear if that was the author's actual intention, and even if it was, most uses of the meme (see the femboy example) are not facially antisemitic and at worst are just examples of edgelord humor. It looks like C++ is finally succumbing to entryism, meanin…
> it's not clear if that was the author's actual intention The paper[1] doesn't appear to have any other connections to the book/response/memes. A clear distinction is that the UB paper very directly and prominently states the question, rather than cloaking it in allusion or having a lengthy preface trying to contextualize it. [1] https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2024/p34...
Re: C++ Standards Contributor Expelled for 'The Undefined Behavior Question'
#96and r/cpp mods just woke up, banning everyone who question (am I still allowed to use that word?) this lunatic behavior. For context: A week ago, someone out for blood put out a slander article referencing this amongst other things. edit: After going on a banning spree, foonathan nuked the thread with "I am not going to deal with this on a Sunday". Nice
Hey, u/ss99ww. We did not go on a banning spree, we banned only one person, you. After removing the comment we're you insulted someone, I checked your history, noticed that you did not meaningfully participate in r/cpp outside this thread, and decided to remove someone from the community who'd only be there to cause trouble. (And for the record, we barely removed any comments, just the ones that directly insulted peo…
Re: C++ Standards Contributor Expelled for 'The Undefined Behavior Question'
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Interesting that you did not choose to voice your opinions using your main accounts on that community then. I'd love to, but reddit and cpp keep banning/suspending accounts - so I can't! Funny how that works isn't it? > Nah, that was just the comment I used to get to your profile. I banned you for insulting someone. That is not true. Here is the message: > Hello, You have been permanently banned from participating…
> That is not true. I banned you, so I like to think I'm an authority on why you were banned. Here's a step by step timeline of what happened. 1. This comment of yours received a high number of reports and was automatically filtered: https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/1gyiwwc/comment/lyp3jl... 2. I agreed with the reports and removed your comments. 3. I read the rest of the comments in your thread, and noticed you…
Re: C++ Standards Contributor Expelled for 'The Undefined Behavior Question'
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Interesting that you did not choose to voice your opinions using your main accounts on that community then Yes, it's interesting that someone opted to use an alternate account to discuss a contentious issue on a platform rife with censorship and deplatforming.
Why does it so often seem that the people complaining about censorship are the ones punching down? Why is it so often someone's right to complain and make problems for others but never concern about people's right to be tolerated when they're being decent humans? Either people need to be banned who insult others and use slurs and those who maliciously push right up against the rules, or they will bully people out. Lo…
Re: C++ Standards Contributor Expelled for 'The Undefined Behavior Question'
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think it's important context that this huge issue is being silenced on the largest c++ community
Not sure this _is_ a huge issue. As someone who's not involved it just seems like standard issue interpersonal drama that happens on every committee, board etc and to every tech project from time to time. eg in linux, git exists because of the Larry McEvoy Bitkeeper drama, there was the Eric S Raymond kernel build config drama, there were numerous Reiserfs and devfs dramas, etc etc etc. In the gnu/fsf world we have h…