Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Isn't Whatsapp supposed to be end-to-end encrypted? It is supposedly end-to-end encrypted. And in a shallow way. Also the app is closed source and you can't develop your own. It's basically end-to-end-trust-me-bro-level encrypted.
I'm more disturbed by the fact that on HN we have 0 devs confirming or denying this thing about FBs internals wrt encryption. We know there are many devs that work there that are also HN users. But I've yet to see one of them chime in on this discussion. That should scare a lot of us.
Arrest of Pavel Durov, Telegram CEO, charges of terrorism, fraud, child porn
501–510 of 878 posts
Re: Arrest of Pavel Durov, Telegram CEO, charges of terrorism, fraud, child porn
#502A lot of really terrible takes in this comment section. Telegram didn't have encrypted groups by default, and telegram possessed a lot of content on their servers that they had been made aware was illegal and didn't cooperate. Nothing more, nothing less. The comparisons to other providers is off base because either other providers are cooperating more when they possess actionable, unencrypted information and taking s…
---
https://i.imgur.com/ixak5vq.png
>This reminds me of the entire plot to the last of the Bourne movies, Jason Bourne, where there is a scene of the head of some intel agency (Tommy Lee Jones) propositioned a social media founder to give them backdoor access or he would be killed. Great movie.
Fun Thread:
https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1f0i2yi/guess_w...
Re: Arrest of Pavel Durov, Telegram CEO, charges of terrorism, fraud, child porn
#503Earlier quoted context omitted.
But why don’t they arrest them for allowing it to happen? Phone calls should be actively moderated to block customers who speak about terrorist activity.
Because the telcos _cooperate_ with law enforcement. It's not whether the platform is being used for illegal activity (all platforms are to some extent, as your facile comment shows). It's whether the operator of a platform actively avoids cooperating with LE to stop that activity once found.
The real goal is hurting anyone that’s not aligned with people in power regardless of who is getting helped or harmed. Everyone knows this but so many people in this thread are lying about it.
Re: Arrest of Pavel Durov, Telegram CEO, charges of terrorism, fraud, child porn
#504Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Then I think you're legally required to tell the truth here. Or you can just not respond, at least in the US. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-incrimination
That only applies if you're the defendant. If you're the witness to a murder and you're subpoena'd to court and refuse to testify then you are committing contempt of court. There was a guy in Illinois who got 20 years (reduced to 6 on appeal) for refusing to testify in a murder. https://illinoiscaselaw.com/clecourses/contempt-of-court-max... Contempt of court usually has no boundaries on the punishment, nor any jury…
Re: Arrest of Pavel Durov, Telegram CEO, charges of terrorism, fraud, child porn
#505Earlier quoted context omitted.
Generally, there is no general legal obligation for bystanders or witnesses to report a crime, but there are exceptions.
To what jurisdiction are you referring?
Re: Arrest of Pavel Durov, Telegram CEO, charges of terrorism, fraud, child porn
#506Earlier quoted context omitted.
What about the server? Telegram is not strictly e2e.
Huh, I was going to point out that the Signal server isn't Free Software either, since for a while it wasn't being published, but it seems they have gotten back into publishing it. https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Server
Re: Arrest of Pavel Durov, Telegram CEO, charges of terrorism, fraud, child porn
#507Earlier quoted context omitted.
In most jurisdictions yes AFAIK, if those services directly help an illegal activity, and you knew about the illegal activity.
Ok, like selling gasoline to the getaway car driver?
You’re making the opposite point of what you intended.
Re: Arrest of Pavel Durov, Telegram CEO, charges of terrorism, fraud, child porn
#508Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think in most modern democracies you aren’t legally required to tell the police anything. Courts are a different case though.
As a suspect . At least in court, as a completely non-involved bystander you have no right of refusal to testify in most jurisdictions. Not sure whether that extends to police questioning though.
Re: Arrest of Pavel Durov, Telegram CEO, charges of terrorism, fraud, child porn
#509Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is it illegal to offer legal services to undesirables and/or criminals?
If you know your services are going to be used to commit a crime, then yes, that makes you an accessory and basically all jurisdictions (I know basically nothing about French criminal law) can prosecute you for that. Crime is, y'know, illegal.
Why aren't all gun manufacturers in jail then? They must know a percentage of their products are going to be used to commit crimes. A much larger percentage than those using Telegram to commit one.
Re: Arrest of Pavel Durov, Telegram CEO, charges of terrorism, fraud, child porn
#510Earlier quoted context omitted.
This distinction gets lost in these discussions all of the time. A company that makes an effort to comply with laws is in a completely different category than a company that makes the fact that they’ll look the other way one of their core selling points. Years ago there was a case where someone built a business out of making hidden compartments in cars. He did an amazing job of making James Bond style hidden compartm…
Is it illegal to offer legal services to undesirables and/or criminals?