Earlier quoted context omitted.
Here's their argument (which I disagree with, but I believe I understand what it is to the extent where I can explain it): 1. Person A starts creating work W and selling it as a profession 2. Person B also starts creating work W and giving it out for free (with some Patreon income, but that is not the point here) 3. Person A can no longer compete with person B, because free is free. Person A is no longer paid
If that's the case, I guess my confusion comes from how one can assume this position and in the next breath complain about people acting entitled to others' work?
I don't know, man.